Lotte Mathé
About
In The Last Decade
Lotte Mathé
7 papers receiving 360 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Infectious Diseases 192
- Molecular Biology 159
- Food Science 122
- Epidemiology 107
- Plant Science 51
Countries citing papers authored by Lotte Mathé
This map shows the geographic impact of Lotte Mathé's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lotte Mathé with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lotte Mathé more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lotte Mathé
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lotte Mathé. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lotte Mathé. The network helps show where Lotte Mathé may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lotte Mathé
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lotte Mathé. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lotte Mathé based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lotte Mathé. Lotte Mathé is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28 | |
| 2 | Comparison between the vapor-phase-mediated anti-Candida activity of conventional and organic essential oils | 3 |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 227 | |
| 6 | 40 | |
| 7 | 39 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.