Lothar Rogge

675 citations
64 papers · 435 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Lothar Rogge

52 papers receiving 331 citations

Peers

Lothar Rogge
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Statistics and Probability 186
  • Mathematical Physics 189
  • Applied Mathematics 136
  • Numerical Analysis 68
  • Geometry and Topology 76
Replace Dieter Landers with:
Dieter Landers Germany
Gabriella Salinetti Italy
R. Bojanić United States
S. A. Chobanyan United States
Pier Luigi Papini Italy
V. Tarieladze Georgia
J. R. Baxter United States
Victor Goodman United States
N. N. Vakhania Georgia
Vladimir Rotar Russia
Lothar Rogge relative to Dieter Landers Germany Dieter Landers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Dieter Landers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lothar Rogge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lothar Rogge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lothar Rogge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lothar Rogge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lothar Rogge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lothar Rogge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lothar Rogge. The network helps show where Lothar Rogge may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Lothar Rogge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lothar Rogge Line = papers co-authored together Lothar Rogge links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198048
2 198137
3 197635
4 198134
5 198721
6 199220
7 197619
8 198716
9 197415
10 197614
11 197113
12 198711
13 197910
14 19869
15 19749
16 19888
17 19947
18 19727
19 19816
20
A NOTE ON COMPLETENESS.
19766

About Lothar Rogge

Lothar Rogge is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Statistics and Probability and Applied Mathematics, having authored 64 papers that have together received 435 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Topology and Set Theory (17 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (13 papers), Approximation Theory and Sequence Spaces (13 papers), Advanced Banach Space Theory (10 papers), Mathematical Approximation and Integration (8 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (8 papers), Mathematical functions and polynomials (4 papers) and Probability and Risk Models (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (186 citations), Mathematical Physics (189 citations), Applied Mathematics (136 citations), Numerical Analysis (68 citations) and Geometry and Topology (76 citations). Lothar Rogge has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Dieter Landers, M. Goldstein, Werner Haußmann, Bent Fuglede, W. K. Hayman, Hermann Render, Stephen J. Gardiner and D. H. Armitage. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Probability Theory and Related Fields, manuscripta mathematica, The Annals of Probability and Transactions of the American Mathematical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact