Lorna Hobbs
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Rachel DavisZoe Jane‐Lara HildonSusan MichieRona CampbellSonia JohnsonMark HintonSarah StocktonBrynmor Lloyd‐Evans
- Topics
- Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (5 papers)Sexual function and dysfunction studies (3 papers)Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers)
- Journals
- The LancetSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe British Journal of Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesQatar
In The Last Decade
Lorna Hobbs
13 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
- General Health Professions 370
- Applied Psychology 257
- Clinical Psychology 200
- Psychiatry and Mental health 196
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 166
Countries citing papers authored by Lorna Hobbs
This map shows the geographic impact of Lorna Hobbs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lorna Hobbs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lorna Hobbs more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lorna Hobbs
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lorna Hobbs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lorna Hobbs. The network helps show where Lorna Hobbs may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lorna Hobbs
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lorna Hobbs. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lorna Hobbs based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lorna Hobbs. Lorna Hobbs is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | Evaluating the Impact of the Investing in Innovation Fund (i3) UPSTART Project on Rural Preschoolers' Early Literacy Skills. | 0 |
| 9 | Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: a scoping reviewbreakdown → | 869 |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 45 | |
| 13 | 121 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 11 |
About Lorna Hobbs
Lorna Hobbs is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (5 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (3 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (257 citations), General Health Professions (370 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (196 citations). Lorna Hobbs has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Rachel Davis, Zoe Jane‐Lara Hildon, Susan Michie, Rona Campbell, Sonia Johnson, Mark Hinton, Sarah Stockton, Brynmor Lloyd‐Evans, Stephen Pilling and Zheng Yan. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and The British Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.