Lord Bingham

598 total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 285 citations indexed

About

Lord Bingham is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Lord Bingham has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 285 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Law, 3 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 1 paper in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Lord Bingham's work include Judicial and Constitutional Studies (2 papers), Legal principles and applications (2 papers) and International Law and Aviation (1 paper). Lord Bingham is often cited by papers focused on Judicial and Constitutional Studies (2 papers), Legal principles and applications (2 papers) and International Law and Aviation (1 paper). Lord Bingham collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Thailand. Lord Bingham's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as The Cambridge Law Journal, Ecclesiastical Law Journal and Alternative Law Journal.

In The Last Decade

Lord Bingham

3 papers receiving 207 citations

Hit Papers

THE RULE OF LAW 2007 2026 2013 2019 2007 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Lord Bingham United Kingdom 2 145 123 102 36 28 6 285
Dieter Grimm Germany 13 232 1.6× 457 3.7× 162 1.6× 31 0.9× 47 1.7× 71 596
Federico Fabbrini Ireland 15 116 0.8× 398 3.2× 90 0.9× 49 1.4× 36 1.3× 86 507
Philip P. Frickey United States 11 189 1.3× 118 1.0× 55 0.5× 152 4.2× 51 1.8× 46 356
Carole Silver United States 8 93 0.6× 52 0.4× 14 0.1× 45 1.3× 38 1.4× 47 192
Gerard W. Gawalt United States 9 87 0.6× 84 0.7× 46 0.5× 54 1.5× 19 0.7× 28 219
Mattias Kumm United States 14 345 2.4× 563 4.6× 196 1.9× 40 1.1× 115 4.1× 43 722
Donald P. Kommers United States 11 251 1.7× 261 2.1× 115 1.1× 72 2.0× 30 1.1× 53 423
Bojan Bugarič United Kingdom 12 112 0.8× 352 2.9× 153 1.5× 49 1.4× 27 1.0× 31 486
Mark Dawson Germany 11 72 0.5× 378 3.1× 61 0.6× 30 0.8× 64 2.3× 59 463
Yuval Shany Israel 13 114 0.8× 447 3.6× 163 1.6× 12 0.3× 179 6.4× 78 533

Countries citing papers authored by Lord Bingham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lord Bingham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lord Bingham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lord Bingham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lord Bingham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lord Bingham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lord Bingham. The network helps show where Lord Bingham may publish in the future.

No nodes

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
1.
Bingham, Lord. (2010). The Uses of Tort. 1(1). 3–15. 1 indexed citations
2.
Bingham, Lord. (2009). What is the Law?. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review. 40(3). 597–612.
3.
Bingham, Lord. (2009). Dignity, Fairness and Good Government. Alternative Law Journal. 34(2). 74–79. 1 indexed citations
4.
Bingham, Lord. (2008). The Rule of Law and the Sovereignty of Parliament?. King s Law Journal. 19(2). 223–234.
5.
Bingham, Lord. (2007). THE RULE OF LAW. The Cambridge Law Journal. 66(1). 67–85. 282 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Bingham, Lord. (2005). ‘Endowed by Their Creator’?. Ecclesiastical Law Journal. 8(37). 173–185. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026