Ecclesiastical Law Journal

400 papers and 610 indexed citations i.

About

The 400 papers published in Ecclesiastical Law Journal in the last decades have received a total of 610 indexed citations. Papers published in Ecclesiastical Law Journal usually cover Law (209 papers), Sociology and Political Science (166 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (164 papers) specifically the topics of Religious Freedom and Discrimination (179 papers), Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (107 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (97 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ecclesiastical Law Journal are Rowan Williams, Norman Doe, Mark Hill, Russell Sandberg, Michał Rynkowski, Julian Rivers, Richard H. Helmholz, Silvio Ferrari, J. H. Baker and Ian Leigh.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Ecclesiastical Law Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ecclesiastical Law Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ecclesiastical Law Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Ecclesiastical Law Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ecclesiastical Law Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ecclesiastical Law Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ecclesiastical Law Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025