Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Rethinking social impacts of tourism research: A new research agenda
2011519 citationsMargaret Deery, Leo Jago et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Liz Fredline's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liz Fredline with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liz Fredline more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liz Fredline. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liz Fredline. The network helps show where Liz Fredline may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Liz Fredline
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Liz Fredline.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Liz Fredline based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Liz Fredline. Liz Fredline is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Raybould, Michael, David W. Anning, Liz Fredline, & D. M. Ware. (2015). URBAN BEACH VENUES: VULNERABILITY AND SUSTAINABILITY IN THE FACE OF CLIMATE CHANGE. Bond University Research Portal (Bond University). 10(1). 84–105.2 indexed citations
Jones, Thomas J., David L. Wood, Margaret Deery, et al.. (2011). Ningaloo Collaboration Cluster: Socio-economics of tourism. Ningaloo Collaboration Cluster Final Report No. 3. Murdoch Research Repository (Murdoch University).1 indexed citations
8.
Hughes, Michael, Tod Jones, Margaret Deery, et al.. (2009). Estimating the economic, social and environmental value of tourism to protected areas. Technical report. Murdoch Research Repository (Murdoch University).3 indexed citations
9.
Hughes, Michael, Tod Jones, Margaret Deery, et al.. (2009). Estimating the Economic, Social and Environmental Value of Tourism to Protected Areas. Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University).6 indexed citations
10.
Fredline, Liz, et al.. (2008). Special Issue: Special sport events - Part II.. Journal of Sport Management. 22(4). 385–486.7 indexed citations
11.
Dwyer, Larry, Peter Forsyth, Liz Fredline, Leo Jago, & Margaret Deery. (2006). Concepts of tourism yield and their measurement. Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University). 4. 243s–246s.15 indexed citations
12.
Fredline, Liz, Margaret Deery, & Leo Jago. (2006). Development of a scale to assess the social impact of tourism within communities. Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University).18 indexed citations
Deery, Margaret, Leo Jago, Liz Fredline, & Larry Dwyer. (2005). The National Business Events Study: an Evaluation of the Australian Business Events Sector. Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University).10 indexed citations
16.
Russell, Roslyn, et al.. (2005). Saver Plus: Improving financial literacy through encouraging savings.
Fredline, Liz, et al.. (2001). International Market Analysis of Wildlife Tourism. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia).18 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.