Li‐Ya Qiao

67 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Li‐Ya Qiao
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Urology 344
  • Gastroenterology 187
  • Sensory Systems 120
  • Physiology 491
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 300
Replace Andrzej Loesch with:
Andrzej Loesch United Kingdom
Zunyi Wang United States
Cherie A. Singer United States
Helen L. Hellmich United States
Jianping Jin United States
Katsuhide Nishi Japan
Inja Lim South Korea
Kersten M. Small United States
Viviana Nociti Italy
Stella O. Page United States
Li‐Ya Qiao relative to Andrzej Loesch United Kingdom Andrzej Loesch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.8×
Andrzej Loesch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Li‐Ya Qiao

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Li‐Ya Qiao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Li‐Ya Qiao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Li‐Ya Qiao more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Li‐Ya Qiao

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Li‐Ya Qiao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Li‐Ya Qiao. The network helps show where Li‐Ya Qiao may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Li‐Ya Qiao, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Li‐Ya Qiao Line = papers co-authored together Li‐Ya Qiao links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999191
2 200287
3 199985
4 200481
5 200275
6 200965
7 200265
8 200754
9 200754
10 201544
11 201244
12 201339
13 200437
14 200936
15 201535
16 200634
17 200531
18 200531
19 200329
20 202029

About Li‐Ya Qiao

Li‐Ya Qiao is a scholar working on Physiology, Molecular Biology, Ophthalmology, Gastroenterology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (14 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (13 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (11 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (11 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (8 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (8 papers), Ion Channels and Receptors (8 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (344 citations), Gastroenterology (187 citations), Sensory Systems (120 citations), Physiology (491 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (300 citations). Li‐Ya Qiao has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Margaret A. Vizzard, Xiao‐Jian Sun, John R. Grider, Jonathan Goldberg, Shanwei Shen, John J. Mitchell, Chunmei Xia, Shaoheng He, Xiaolong Wei and Ji‐Fu Wei. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Neurology, The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Gastroenterology and American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact