Lisong Ni

1.0k citations
29 papers · 829 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Lisong Ni

27 papers receiving 810 citations

Peers

Lisong Ni
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 301
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 36
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 157
  • Biological Psychiatry 16
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 86
Replace Christoph von der Goltz with:
Christoph von der Goltz Germany
Martin H. Plawecki United States
Peter K. Thanos United States
Yavor Yalachkov Germany
Linh C. Dang United States
Marcel Bahro Switzerland
Jarmila Hallman Sweden
Leanne Trick United Kingdom
E. W. Thornton United Kingdom
Terrence Sills Canada
Lisong Ni relative to Christoph von der Goltz Germany Christoph von der Goltz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Christoph von der Goltz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lisong Ni

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisong Ni's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisong Ni with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisong Ni more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisong Ni

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisong Ni. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisong Ni. The network helps show where Lisong Ni may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lisong Ni, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lisong Ni Line = papers co-authored together Lisong Ni links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013175
2 200699
3 200597
4 200082
5 200177
6 201234
7 200933
8 201033
9 199925
10 201623
11 199719
12 201519
13 200416
14 200314
15 200213
16 201910
17 20039
18 20138
19 19988
20 19987

About Lisong Ni

Lisong Ni is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Neurology and Cell Biology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 829 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (7 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (4 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (3 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (2 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (301 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (36 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (157 citations), Biological Psychiatry (16 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (86 citations). Lisong Ni has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Edward F. Domino, Jon‐Kar Zubieta, Sally K. Guthrie, Robert A. Koeppe, Mary M. Heitzeg, Satoshi Minoshima, Edward F. Domino, Yanjun Xu, David Scott and Jennifer Crocker. Their work appears in journals such as Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, Experimental Neurology, Molecular Psychiatry, European Journal of Pharmacology and Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact