Lisbeth Ku

916 citations
21 papers · 685 · h-index 13

Impact in

    • Behavioral Health and Interventions
    • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Marketing top 5%
    • Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification

Papers in

Lisbeth Ku

19 papers receiving 653 citations

Peers

Lisbeth Ku
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Applied Psychology 139
  • Marketing 138
  • Social Psychology 173
  • Sociology and Political Science 358
  • Clinical Psychology 165
Replace Elke Rohmann with:
Elke Rohmann Germany
Julan Xie China
Roselyn J. Lee-Won United States
Yongyu Guo China
Kate Witteveen Australia
Anca M. Miron United States
Jordan D. Troisi United States
Maèva Flayelle Switzerland
Kenneth Tai Singapore
Lisbeth Ku relative to Elke Rohmann Germany Elke Rohmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Elke Rohmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lisbeth Ku

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisbeth Ku's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisbeth Ku with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisbeth Ku more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisbeth Ku

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisbeth Ku. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisbeth Ku. The network helps show where Lisbeth Ku may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Lisbeth Ku, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lisbeth Ku Line = papers co-authored together Lisbeth Ku links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013264
2 202074
3 201153
4 201246
5 201445
6 202235
7 201434
8 201429
9 201419
10 201816
11 201516
12 201416
13 202213
14 20169
15 20205
16 20195
17 20233
18 20222
19 20241
20 20140

About Lisbeth Ku

Lisbeth Ku is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Marketing, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 685 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (5 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (3 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (3 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers), Environmental Sustainability in Business (3 papers) and Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (139 citations), Marketing (138 citations), Social Psychology (173 citations), Sociology and Political Science (358 citations) and Clinical Psychology (165 citations). Lisbeth Ku has collaborated with scholars based in Macao, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Anise M. S. Wu, Eva P. W. Hung, Robin Banerjee, Helga Dittmar, Charles M. Zaroff, Ma. Jenina N. Nalipay, Yan Wu, Gertina J. van Schalkwyk, Beatrice P. Y. Lai and Francis Cheung. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Psychology, Sustainability, Psychology and Marketing, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology and Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact