Lisa Shabel
Impact in
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science
- Philosophy, Science, and History
- Theoretical Computer Science top 10%
- History and Theory of Mathematics
Papers in
-
- Philosophy, Science, and History 2
- Historical Philosophy and Science 1
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 2
- Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy 1
- Co-authors
- Paul Guyer (2 shared papers)Allen W. Wood (2 shared papers)Béatrice Longuenesse (1 shared paper)Ralph C. S. Walker (1 shared paper)Jane Kneller (1 shared paper)Lara Denis (1 shared paper)Gary Hatfield (1 shared paper)Karl Ameriks (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A (2 papers)Journal of the history of philosophy (1 paper)Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania) (1 paper)Cambridge University Press eBooks (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Lisa Shabel
7 papers receiving 131 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- History and Philosophy of Science 72
- Theoretical Computer Science 16
- Philosophy 120
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 60
- General Psychology 5
Countries citing papers authored by Lisa Shabel
This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa Shabel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa Shabel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa Shabel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa Shabel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa Shabel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa Shabel. The network helps show where Lisa Shabel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lisa Shabel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 78 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 38 | |
| 3 | Mathematics in Kant's Critical Philosophy: Reflections on Mathematical Practice | 2002 | 22 |
| 4 | 2004 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 4 |
About Lisa Shabel
Lisa Shabel is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Theoretical Computer Science, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 7 papers that have together received 170 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 papers), Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (1 paper), History and Theory of Mathematics (1 paper) and Historical Philosophy and Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (72 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (16 citations), Philosophy (120 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (60 citations) and General Psychology (5 citations). Lisa Shabel has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul Guyer, Allen W. Wood, Béatrice Longuenesse, Ralph C. S. Walker, Jane Kneller, Lara Denis, Gary Hatfield, Karl Ameriks, Michael Friedman and Robert B. Pippin. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Journal of the history of philosophy, Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania) and Cambridge University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.