Paul Redding
Impact in
- Philosophy top 2%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
- Philosophy and Historical Thought
- Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education
- Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
-
- Philosophy, Science, and History
Papers in
- Philosophy 32
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 17
- Philosophy and Historical Thought 8
- Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education 6
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought 5
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 4
-
- Philosophy, Science, and History 9
Paul Redding
39 papers receiving 182 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Philosophy 157
- History and Philosophy of Science 44
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 43
- General Social Sciences 10
- General Psychology 3
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Redding
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Redding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Redding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Redding more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Redding
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Redding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Redding. The network helps show where Paul Redding may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Paul Redding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 6 | |
| 7 | Tragedy, Recognition and the Death of God | 2013 | 2 |
| 8 | Nineteenth-Century Philosophy of Religion | 2013 | 1 |
| 9 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 10 | Review of The Philosophy of Richard Rorty | 2011 | 0 |
| 11 | 2011 | 0 | |
| 12 | Feeling, thought and orientation: William James and the idealist anti-Cartesian tradition | 2011 | 5 |
| 13 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 16 | |
| 15 | Idealism: A Love (of Sophia) that Dare not Speak its Name | 2007 | 1 |
| 16 | Hegel, Idealism and God: Philosophy as the Self-Correcting Appropriation of the Norms of Life and Thought | 2007 | 5 |
| 17 | 2003 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1996 | 36 | |
| 19 | 1994 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1991 | 1 |
About Paul Redding
Paul Redding is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, General Social Sciences, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and General Psychology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 212 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (17 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (10 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (9 papers), Philosophy and Historical Thought (8 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (6 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (5 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers) and Critical Theory and Philosophy (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (157 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (44 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (43 citations), General Social Sciences (10 citations) and General Psychology (3 citations). Paul Redding has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Dominic Murphy, Neil McNaughton, Stephen Stich, Chris Ryan and Douglas Hedley. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Philosophy, Critical Horizons, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Religious Studies and The Monist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.