Lisa M. Slatt

16 papers receiving 411 citations

Peers

Lisa M. Slatt
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • General Health Professions 240
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 131
  • Sociology and Political Science 93
  • Health 73
  • Clinical Psychology 72
Replace John Frey with:
John Frey United States
Beatrice J. Krauss United States
Dolores Simpson United States
Aaron T. Vissman United States
Aliza Monroe‐Wise United States
Carol A. Patsdaughter United States
Diana M. Sheehan United States
E. Karina Santamaria United States
Rebecca Barnes United Kingdom
Arn Schilder Canada
Lisa M. Slatt relative to John Frey United States John Frey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.2×
John Frey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lisa M. Slatt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa M. Slatt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa M. Slatt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa M. Slatt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa M. Slatt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa M. Slatt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa M. Slatt. The network helps show where Lisa M. Slatt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lisa M. Slatt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lisa M. Slatt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lisa M. Slatt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lisa M. Slatt. Lisa M. Slatt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Do we pay our community preceptors? Results from a CERA clerkship directors' survey.
22
2
Effect of Spanish language immersion rotations on medical student Spanish fluency.
20
3
Creating a multi-institutional family medicine clerkship examination: lessons learned.
5
4 56
5 28
6 53
7
Sexually transmitted infections and increased risk of co-infection with human immunodeficiency virus.
73
8 2
9 70
10
Focus groups: a useful tool for curriculum evaluation.
19
11 27
12
Validating audiovisual reviews as a strategy for teaching behavioral medicine to primary care residents.
2
13 26
14 41
15
Career choice in family medicine: a longitudinal study.
1
16 1

About Lisa M. Slatt

Lisa M. Slatt is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 16 papers that have together received 446 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (4 papers) and Nursing Roles and Practices (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (240 citations), Family Practice (20 citations) and Health (73 citations). Lisa M. Slatt has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Pamela Y. Frasier, Vicki Kowlowitz, Daniel S. Reuland, Charles P. Friedman, Elin Kondrad, Margaret Nusbaum, Beat Steiner, Adam O. Goldstein, Diane Calleson and Alicia Fernández. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of General Internal Medicine, Academic Medicine and Patient Education and Counseling.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026