Katherine Margo

612 total citations
33 papers, 411 citations indexed

About

Katherine Margo is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Katherine Margo has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 411 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in General Health Professions, 12 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 4 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Katherine Margo's work include Innovations in Medical Education (9 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (5 papers) and Diversity and Career in Medicine (4 papers). Katherine Margo is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (9 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (5 papers) and Diversity and Career in Medicine (4 papers). Katherine Margo collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Katherine Margo's co-authors include Robert J. Winn, D Kaplan, S. B. Gupta, Prakash S. Masand, Maya M. Hammoud, Jonathan Fisher, Jennifer G. Christner, Shira H. Fischer, Louis N. Pangaro and Jonathan A. Drezner and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of General Internal Medicine, Academic Medicine and The Annals of Family Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Katherine Margo

31 papers receiving 387 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Katherine Margo United States 11 127 122 63 61 50 33 411
Sandra Adams Motzer United States 11 105 0.8× 157 1.3× 138 2.2× 32 0.5× 3 0.1× 17 474
Abdolmehdi Baghaei Iran 7 83 0.7× 89 0.7× 12 0.2× 45 0.7× 3 0.1× 12 416
Nikhil Satchidanand United States 8 25 0.2× 46 0.4× 95 1.5× 43 0.7× 13 0.3× 21 312
Wouter Wijker Netherlands 6 103 0.8× 110 0.9× 7 0.1× 99 1.6× 3 0.1× 7 664
Angelia Mosley‐Williams United States 9 32 0.3× 50 0.4× 10 0.2× 140 2.3× 10 0.2× 15 479
Deborah Fellowes United Kingdom 8 122 1.0× 78 0.6× 36 0.6× 46 0.8× 1 0.0× 14 484
Shu‐Ching Chi Taiwan 8 53 0.4× 55 0.5× 13 0.2× 43 0.7× 2 0.0× 15 402
Emma Brooks United Kingdom 8 101 0.8× 89 0.7× 8 0.1× 21 0.3× 4 0.1× 15 321
Michele M. Carlin United States 9 99 0.8× 104 0.9× 4 0.1× 67 1.1× 5 0.1× 15 331
Alessio Degl’ Innocenti Sweden 8 25 0.2× 76 0.6× 66 1.0× 83 1.4× 2 0.0× 16 352

Countries citing papers authored by Katherine Margo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Katherine Margo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katherine Margo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katherine Margo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Katherine Margo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katherine Margo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katherine Margo. The network helps show where Katherine Margo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Katherine Margo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Katherine Margo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Katherine Margo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Katherine Margo. Katherine Margo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Foster‐Johnson, Lynn, et al.. (2022). Enhancing Examination Success: the Cumulative Benefits of Self-Assessment Questions and Virtual Patient Cases. Medical Science Educator. 32(5). 985–993.
2.
Ockene, Judith K., Lori Pbert, Sybil Crawford, et al.. (2021). Teaching Medical Students to Help Patients Manage Their Weight: Outcomes of an Eight-School Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 36(10). 3000–3007. 7 indexed citations
3.
Ockene, Judith K., Rashelle B. Hayes, Linda Churchill, et al.. (2017). Design and rationale of the medical students learning weight management counseling skills (MSWeight) group randomized controlled trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 64. 58–66. 10 indexed citations
4.
Anthony, David, Jordan White, Katherine Margo, & Derjung M. Tarn. (2017). Scope of Practice and Family Medicine Match Rates: Results From a CERA Clerkship Directors' Survey.. PubMed. 49(3). 177–182. 6 indexed citations
5.
Anthony, David, et al.. (2014). Do we pay our community preceptors? Results from a CERA clerkship directors' survey.. PubMed. 46(3). 167–73. 22 indexed citations
6.
Bream, Kent D. W., et al.. (2014). Comparison of textbook to fmCases on family medicine clerkship exam performance.. PubMed. 46(3). 174–9. 4 indexed citations
7.
Hammoud, Maya M., Katherine Margo, Jennifer G. Christner, et al.. (2012). Opportunities and Challenges in Integrating Electronic Health Records Into Undergraduate Medical Education: A National Survey of Clerkship Directors. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 24(3). 219–224. 60 indexed citations
8.
Clements, Douglas H., et al.. (2012). STFM UNVEILS THE NATIONAL FAMILY MEDICINE CLERKSHIP CURRICULUM WEBSITE. The Annals of Family Medicine. 10(3). 275–276. 3 indexed citations
9.
Carney, Patricia A., Susan Cochella, G. Leroy, et al.. (2011). FAMILY MEDICINE CLERKSHIP CURRICULUM--NEXT STEPS. The Annals of Family Medicine. 9(1). 88–89. 1 indexed citations
10.
Ephgrave, Kimberly S., Katherine Margo, Christopher B. White, et al.. (2010). Core Clerkship Directors: Their Current Resources and the Rewards of the Role. Academic Medicine. 85(4). 710–715. 13 indexed citations
11.
Margo, Katherine, et al.. (2009). Clerkship Directors' Characteristics, Scholarship, and Support: A Summary of Published Surveys From Seven Medical Specialties. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 21(2). 94–99. 12 indexed citations
12.
Gazewood, John D., et al.. (2007). Predoctoral directors: who are they and what do they do in these trying times?. PubMed. 39(3). 171–7. 4 indexed citations
13.
Sadovsky, Richard, Sandeep Dhindsa, & Katherine Margo. (2007). Testosterone deficiency: which patients should you screen and treat?. PubMed. 56(5 Suppl Testosterone). S1–20; quiz S21. 8 indexed citations
14.
Margo, Katherine & Robert J. Winn. (2006). Testosterone treatments: why, when, and how?. PubMed. 73(9). 1591–8. 40 indexed citations
15.
Gallo, Joseph J., Hillary R. Bogner, Joseph B. Straton, et al.. (2005). Patient Characteristics Associated with Participation in a Practice-Based Study of Depression in Late Life: The Spectrum Study. The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine. 35(1). 41–57. 25 indexed citations
16.
Margo, Katherine. (2005). Psychological interventions for noncardiac chest pain.. PubMed. 72(9). 1701–2. 2 indexed citations
17.
Margo, Katherine, et al.. (2003). Evaluation and management of hip pain: an algorithmic approach.. PubMed. 52(8). 607–17. 27 indexed citations
18.
Margo, Katherine. (2000). An 8 session exercise programme was effective for subacute or chronic low back pain. Evidence-Based Medicine. 5(3). 77–77. 1 indexed citations
19.
Margo, Katherine, et al.. (1994). The problem of somatization in family practice.. PubMed. 49(8). 1873–9. 13 indexed citations
20.
Margo, Katherine, et al.. (1990). Practical application of a patient satisfaction survey.. PubMed. 4(3). 104–8. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026