Lisa Blackman

3.1k citations
50 papers · 1.8k indexed · h-index 20

Lisa Blackman

50 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Lisa Blackman
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Geography, Planning and Development 256
  • Cultural Studies 376
  • General Psychology 39
  • Gender Studies 268
  • Philosophy 198
Replace Julian Henriques with:
Julian Henriques United Kingdom
Luther H. Martin United States
Lennard J. Davis United States
Ian Burkitt United Kingdom
Kathleen Lennon United Kingdom
Paul Stoller United States
Megan Boler Canada
Hazel E. Barnes South Africa
Lisa A. Mazzei United States
Wimal Dissanayake United States
Lisa Blackman relative to Julian Henriques United Kingdom Julian Henriques's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Julian Henriques · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lisa Blackman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa Blackman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa Blackman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa Blackman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa Blackman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa Blackman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa Blackman. The network helps show where Lisa Blackman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Lisa Blackman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lisa Blackman Line = papers co-authored together Lisa Blackman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20242
2 20241
3 202111
4 20205
5 20203
6
Haunted Data, Transmedial Storytelling, Affectivity: Attending to "Controversies" as Matters of Ghostly Concern
20195
7 20174
8 20163
9 201517
10 201511
11 20147
12 201419
13
Technologies of Mediation and the Affective: A Case-study of the Mediated Environment of MediaCity UK
20102
14 2010251
15 20099
16
Is happiness contagious
200813
17
The Body: The Key Concepts
200854
18
Mass Hysteria: Critical Psychology and Media Studies
200089
19 200019
20 199414

About Lisa Blackman

Lisa Blackman is a scholar working on General Psychology, Cultural Studies and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (14 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (7 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (5 papers), Diversity and Impact of Dance (5 papers), Social Representations and Identity (5 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (4 papers), Foucault, Power, and Ethics (3 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (256 citations), Cultural Studies (376 citations) and General Psychology (39 citations). Lisa Blackman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Couze Venn, Valerie Walkerdine, John Cromby, Derek Hook, Dimitris Papadopoulos, Mike Featherstone, James C. Hilyer, Milissa L. Kaufman, Jacqui Dillon and Simon McCarthy‐Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Frontiers in Psychiatry and Theory Culture & Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026