Linlin Liu
About
In The Last Decade
Linlin Liu
17 papers receiving 497 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Plant Science 318
- Molecular Biology 247
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 132
- Biochemistry 91
- Food Science 72
Countries citing papers authored by Linlin Liu
This map shows the geographic impact of Linlin Liu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linlin Liu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linlin Liu more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Linlin Liu
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Linlin Liu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Linlin Liu. The network helps show where Linlin Liu may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Linlin Liu
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Linlin Liu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Linlin Liu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Linlin Liu. Linlin Liu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 30 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 75 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 101 | |
| 12 | 58 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 60 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 104 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.