Ling‐Li Leng

410 citations
31 papers · 307 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Ling‐Li Leng

30 papers receiving 296 citations

Peers

Ling‐Li Leng
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 111
  • Animal Science and Zoology 69
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 65
  • Food Science 39
  • Small Animals 15
Replace T. Ribeiro with:
T. Ribeiro Portugal
Anne Connolly United Kingdom
Aoife Hayes Ireland
Nicolas Gausserès France
S. Cooper United Kingdom
Weili Yang China
Jerzy Gębski Poland
Henrik Day Poulsen Denmark
K. L. Mueller Germany
R. Foster United Kingdom
Ling‐Li Leng relative to T. Ribeiro Portugal T. Ribeiro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
T. Ribeiro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ling‐Li Leng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ling‐Li Leng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ling‐Li Leng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ling‐Li Leng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ling‐Li Leng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ling‐Li Leng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ling‐Li Leng. The network helps show where Ling‐Li Leng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ling‐Li Leng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ling‐Li Leng Line = papers co-authored together Ling‐Li Leng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200750
2 200537
3 200831
4 201626
5 200920
6 202116
7
The renal response of sheep to a low dietary nitrogen intake.
198514
8
Micropuncture study on urea movements in the kidney cortical tubules of low protein fed sheep.
199813
9 201711
10 199410
11 200510
12 20209
13 20229
14 20237
15 19886
16 20235
17 20184
18 20184
19 19864
20 19993

About Ling‐Li Leng

Ling‐Li Leng is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Physiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 307 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Selenium in Biological Systems (4 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers), Electrolyte and hormonal disorders (2 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (2 papers) and Birth, Development, and Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (111 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (69 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (65 citations), Food Science (39 citations) and Small Animals (15 citations). Ling‐Li Leng has collaborated with scholars based in Slovakia, Hong Kong and China. Frequent co-authors include Š. Faix, Ľubomíra Grešáková, Z. Faixová, Renáta Szabóová, P. Váczi, SM Ng, Krisztina Boda, Svetlana Kišidayová, Rth Ho and M. Czauderna. Their work appears in journals such as Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Frontiers in Psychiatry, BMC Psychology, Journal of Affective Disorders and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact