Lindsay Fullerton
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Communication top 5%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Co-authors
- G. A. RinkerKristin ThomasEszter HargittaiEricka Menchen-TrevinoJ. G. HillsDavid HuffakerNoshir ContractorMarshall Scott Poole
- Topics
- Social Media and Politics (3 papers)Digital Games and Media (3 papers)Fractional Differential Equations Solutions (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Computational PhysicsThe Astronomical JournalACM Transactions on Mathematical Software
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Lindsay Fullerton
13 papers receiving 548 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 212
- Sociology and Political Science 174
- Communication 112
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 84
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 78
Countries citing papers authored by Lindsay Fullerton
This map shows the geographic impact of Lindsay Fullerton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lindsay Fullerton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lindsay Fullerton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lindsay Fullerton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lindsay Fullerton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lindsay Fullerton. The network helps show where Lindsay Fullerton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lindsay Fullerton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lindsay Fullerton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lindsay Fullerton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lindsay Fullerton. Lindsay Fullerton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | Trust Online: Young Adults' Evaluation of Web Content | 213 |
| 5 | Trust on the Web: How Young Adults Judge the Credibility of Online Content (TOP 2 Faculty Paper) | 1 |
| 6 | 47 | |
| 7 | Focused on the Prize: Characteristics of Experts in Virtual Worlds | 2 |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 67 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 228 |
About Lindsay Fullerton
Lindsay Fullerton is a scholar working on Communication, Modeling and Simulation and Music, having authored 13 papers that have together received 606 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (3 papers), Digital Games and Media (3 papers) and Fractional Differential Equations Solutions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (112 citations), Library and Information Sciences (19 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (212 citations). Lindsay Fullerton has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include G. A. Rinker, Kristin Thomas, Eszter Hargittai, Ericka Menchen-Trevino, J. G. Hills, David Huffaker, Noshir Contractor, Marshall Scott Poole, Dmitri Williams and Jeffrey W. Treem. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Computational Physics, The Astronomical Journal and ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.