Linda Peake

2.9k citations
49 papers · 1.8k indexed · h-index 21

Linda Peake

48 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Linda Peake
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.1k
  • Urban Studies 431
  • Geography, Planning and Development 425
  • Political Science and International Relations 236
  • Gender Studies 200
Replace Mona Domosh with:
Mona Domosh United States
Alastair Bonnett United Kingdom
Lawrence D. Berg Canada
Stephen Nathan Haymes United States
Richa Nagar Czechia
Claudio Minca Netherlands
Don Mitchell United States
Jon Binnie United Kingdom
Rüth Wilson Gilmore United States
Anne Bonds United States
Linda Peake relative to Mona Domosh United States Mona Domosh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Mona Domosh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Linda Peake

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Linda Peake's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linda Peake with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linda Peake more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Linda Peake

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Linda Peake. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Linda Peake. The network helps show where Linda Peake may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Linda Peake

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Linda Peake. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Linda Peake based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Linda Peake. Linda Peake is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 3
3 46
4 99
5 33
6 9
7 24
8
Feminist and quantitative? Measuring the extent of domestic violence in Georgetown, Guyana
3
9 2
10 39
11 10
12 20
13 204
14
Seeing the invisible : women, gender and urban development
9
15 50
16 77
17
Gender and urban politics
1
18 13
19
Fending for ourselves: women as teachers of geography in higher education
4
20
Teaching Feminist Geography: Another Perspective.
3

About Linda Peake

Linda Peake is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Urban Studies and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urban Planning and Governance (9 papers), Historical Geography and Geographical Thought (9 papers) and Rural development and sustainability (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (425 citations), Urban Studies (431 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (1.1k citations). Linda Peake has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Audrey Kobayashi, Beverley Mullings, Sue Ruddick, Eléonore Kofman, Caroline Moser, Janet Momsen, Linda McDowell, Tracey Skelton, Brian Ray and Tim Bunnell. Their work appears in journals such as Progress in Human Geography, Geographical Journal and Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026