Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The asset vulnerability framework: Reassessing urban poverty reduction strategies
Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Moser
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Moser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Moser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Moser more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Moser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Moser. The network helps show where Caroline Moser may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Caroline Moser
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Caroline Moser.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Caroline Moser based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Caroline Moser. Caroline Moser is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Moser, Caroline, Bruce Frayne, & Gina Ziervogel. (2011). ?Understanding the terrain: The climate change, assets and food security nexus in Southern African cities?. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 1–34.4 indexed citations
Moser, Caroline & Andrew J. Felton. (2010). The Gendered Nature of Asset Accumulation in Urban Contexts: Longitudinal Evidence from Guayaquil, Ecuador. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 183–204.3 indexed citations
Moser, Caroline & Anis A. Dani. (2008). Assets and Livelihoods: a Framework for Asset-Based Social Policy. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).32 indexed citations
Moser, Caroline. (2003). Gender-Based Violence: A Serious Development Constraint. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).6 indexed citations
12.
Moser, Caroline. (2003). Moving Ahead with Human Rights: Assessment of the Operationalization of the Human Rights Based Approach in UNICEF Programming: 2002. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).2 indexed citations
Moser, Caroline. (1999). Mainstreaming Gender and Development in the World Bank: Progress and Recommendations. Medical Entomology and Zoology.24 indexed citations
16.
Moser, Caroline & Linda Peake. (1994). Seeing the invisible : women, gender and urban development. TSpace.9 indexed citations
Momsen, Janet, Caroline Moser, & Linda Peake. (1989). Women, Human Settlements and Housing. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 14(1). 119–119.77 indexed citations
19.
Moser, Caroline. (1981). Surviving in the Suburbios. OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies). 12(3). 1–11.10 indexed citations
20.
Moser, Caroline, et al.. (1981). Women of the Working Poor. OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies). 12(3). 1–9.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.