Linda Coyle

2.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
33 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Linda Coyle is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Linda Coyle has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 6 papers in Molecular Biology and 5 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Linda Coyle's work include Topic Modeling (10 papers), Machine Learning in Healthcare (8 papers) and Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (5 papers). Linda Coyle is often cited by papers focused on Topic Modeling (10 papers), Machine Learning in Healthcare (8 papers) and Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (5 papers). Linda Coyle collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Linda Coyle's co-authors include Gladys Block, Anne M. Hartman, Jennifer L. Stevens, Xiao‐Cheng Wu, André Gonçalves, Ana Paula Sales, Priyadip Ray, Braden Soper, Albert R. Hollenbeck and Amy F. Subar and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, PLoS ONE and JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

In The Last Decade

Linda Coyle

32 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Hit Papers

Design and Serendipity in Establishing a Large Cohort wit... 2001 2026 2009 2017 2001 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Linda Coyle United States 14 504 406 304 216 215 33 1.7k
R. L. Prentice United States 16 355 0.7× 135 0.3× 232 0.8× 157 0.7× 107 0.5× 33 1.7k
Dipankar Bandyopadhyay United States 28 125 0.2× 244 0.6× 237 0.8× 235 1.1× 344 1.6× 182 2.6k
Young Ae Kim South Korea 28 316 0.6× 138 0.3× 701 2.3× 201 0.9× 494 2.3× 132 2.6k
Yu Rang Park South Korea 20 165 0.3× 217 0.5× 179 0.6× 97 0.4× 287 1.3× 121 1.6k
Thomas Louis United States 18 239 0.5× 81 0.2× 440 1.4× 117 0.5× 263 1.2× 28 2.1k
Monica Daeges United States 18 193 0.4× 117 0.3× 542 1.8× 120 0.6× 115 0.5× 24 1.9k
Reed T. Sutton Canada 11 272 0.5× 329 0.8× 104 0.3× 76 0.4× 146 0.7× 21 1.9k
Binbing Yu United States 29 271 0.5× 143 0.4× 903 3.0× 416 1.9× 278 1.3× 92 3.0k
Lilly Q. Yue United States 17 181 0.4× 91 0.2× 183 0.6× 303 1.4× 262 1.2× 43 2.3k
Md. Mohaimenul Islam Taiwan 31 190 0.4× 321 0.8× 194 0.6× 259 1.2× 328 1.5× 92 3.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Linda Coyle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Linda Coyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linda Coyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linda Coyle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Linda Coyle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Linda Coyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Linda Coyle. The network helps show where Linda Coyle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Linda Coyle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Linda Coyle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Linda Coyle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Linda Coyle. Linda Coyle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hanson, Heidi A., et al.. (2024). Machine learning and deep learning tools for the automated capture of cancer surveillance data. JNCI Monographs. 2024(65). 145–151. 6 indexed citations
2.
Chen, Huann‐Sheng, Serban Negoita, Steven M. Schwartz, et al.. (2024). Toward real-time reporting of cancer incidence: methodology, pilot study, and SEER Program implementation. JNCI Monographs. 2024(65). 123–131. 1 indexed citations
3.
Danciu, Ioana, Hong‐Jun Yoon, Jamaludin Mohd‐Yusof, et al.. (2023). Deep learning uncertainty quantification for clinical text classification. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 149. 104576–104576. 3 indexed citations
4.
Blanchard, Andrew E., Shang Gao, Hong‐Jun Yoon, et al.. (2022). A Keyword-Enhanced Approach to Handle Class Imbalance in Clinical Text Classification. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics. 26(6). 2796–2803. 10 indexed citations
6.
Gao, Shang, Ioana Danciu, Eric B. Durbin, et al.. (2021). Class imbalance in out-of-distribution datasets: Improving the robustness of the TextCNN for the classification of rare cancer types. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 125. 103957–103957. 37 indexed citations
7.
Gao, Shang, Mohammed Alawad, Hong‐Jun Yoon, et al.. (2021). Deep active learning for classifying cancer pathology reports. BMC Bioinformatics. 22(1). 113–113. 25 indexed citations
8.
Gao, Shang, Mohammed Alawad, M. Todd Young, et al.. (2021). Limitations of Transformers on Clinical Text Classification. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics. 25(9). 3596–3607. 104 indexed citations
9.
Klasky, Hilda, John Gounley, Mohammed Alawad, et al.. (2020). Accelerated training of bootstrap aggregation-based deep information extraction systems from cancer pathology reports. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 110. 103564–103564. 10 indexed citations
10.
Alawad, Mohammed, Hong‐Jun Yoon, Shang Gao, et al.. (2020). Privacy-Preserving Deep Learning NLP Models for Cancer Registries. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing. 9(3). 1219–1230. 31 indexed citations
11.
Gao, Shang, Mohammed Alawad, Lynne Penberthy, et al.. (2020). Using case-level context to classify cancer pathology reports. PLoS ONE. 15(5). e0232840–e0232840. 15 indexed citations
12.
Morawski, Bożena M, et al.. (2020). Impact of Linkage to the Social Security Administration on Follow-up Completeness and Cancer Relative Survival Estimates in 2 New SEER Registries: 2000-2016 Diagnosis Years.. PubMed. 47(2). 37–47. 2 indexed citations
13.
Gonçalves, André, Priyadip Ray, Braden Soper, et al.. (2020). Generation and evaluation of synthetic patient data. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 20(1). 108–108. 223 indexed citations
14.
Gao, Shang, John X. Qiu, Mohammed Alawad, et al.. (2019). Classifying cancer pathology reports with hierarchical self-attention networks. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. 101. 101726–101726. 40 indexed citations
15.
Alawad, Mohammed, Shang Gao, John X. Qiu, et al.. (2019). Automatic extraction of cancer registry reportable information from free-text pathology reports using multitask convolutional neural networks. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 27(1). 89–98. 56 indexed citations
16.
Coyle, Linda, Kathleen A. Cronin, Clara Lam, et al.. (2016). Validation of prostate‐specific antigen laboratory values recorded in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries. Cancer. 123(4). 697–703. 26 indexed citations
18.
Schatzkin, Arthur, Amy F. Subar, Frances E. Thompson, et al.. (2001). Design and Serendipity in Establishing a Large Cohort with Wide Dietary Intake Distributions. American Journal of Epidemiology. 154(12). 1119–1125. 505 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Block, Gladys, et al.. (1994). Revision of Dietary Analysis Software for the Health Habits and History Questionnaire. American Journal of Epidemiology. 139(12). 1190–1196. 261 indexed citations
20.
Block, Gladys, et al.. (1989). A DIETARY AND RISK FACTOR QUESTIONNAIRE AND ANALYSIS SYSTEM FOR PERSONAL COMPUTERS. American Journal of Epidemiology. 129(2). 445–449. 78 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026