Mark Damesyn

16 papers receiving 486 citations

Peers

Mark Damesyn
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Sensory Systems 72
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 43
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 45
  • Speech and Hearing 65
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 63
Replace Konstanze Fendrich with:
Konstanze Fendrich Germany
Kenneth G. Schellhase United States
Lama Assi United States
Ahmed Yassin Jordan
Gorica Marić Serbia
Prasert Assantachai Thailand
Moon Jeong Lee United States
Shiao‐Chi Wu Taiwan
Morteza Shamsizadeh Iran
Eduardo Ferrioli Brazil
Mark Damesyn relative to Konstanze Fendrich Germany Konstanze Fendrich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Konstanze Fendrich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Damesyn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Damesyn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Damesyn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Damesyn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Damesyn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Damesyn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Damesyn. The network helps show where Mark Damesyn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Damesyn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Damesyn Line = papers co-authored together Mark Damesyn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1999150
2 199876
3 199954
4 200049
5 200341
6 202137
7 199730
8 200327
9 201219
10 20138
11 20157
12 20226
13
Drinking Habits Among Older Persons
19996
14 20215
15 20225
16 20032

About Mark Damesyn

Mark Damesyn is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases, Management of Technology and Innovation, Artificial Intelligence and Surgery, having authored 16 papers that have together received 522 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (3 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (3 papers), Blood donation and transfusion practices (2 papers), HIV Research and Treatment (1 paper), Electricity Theft Detection Techniques (1 paper), Body Composition Measurement Techniques (1 paper), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (1 paper) and Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (72 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (43 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (45 citations), Speech and Hearing (65 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (63 citations). Mark Damesyn has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David B. Reuben, Alison Moore, Gail A. Greendale, Stina Mui, Kathleen E. Walsh, Ron D. Hays, Simone A. Glynn, George B. Schreiber, Manying Wang and George J. Salem. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Transfusion, Cancer Biomarkers, JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics and American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact