Linda Angell

1.2k total citations
53 papers, 774 citations indexed

About

Linda Angell is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Automotive Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Linda Angell has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 774 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 44 papers in Social Psychology, 34 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and 9 papers in Automotive Engineering. Recurrent topics in Linda Angell's work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (43 papers), Traffic and Road Safety (33 papers) and Safety Warnings and Signage (18 papers). Linda Angell is often cited by papers focused on Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (43 papers), Traffic and Road Safety (33 papers) and Safety Warnings and Signage (18 papers). Linda Angell collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Poland. Linda Angell's co-authors include Sean Seaman, Bobbie Seppelt, Bryan Reimer, Bruce Mehler, James Foley, Richard A. Young, Joonbum Lee, Miguel A. Pérez, Lex Fridman and Jonathan M. Hankey and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Access, Accident Analysis & Prevention and SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series.

In The Last Decade

Linda Angell

48 papers receiving 704 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Linda Angell United States 15 505 357 219 87 86 53 774
Zachary R. Doerzaph United States 11 429 0.8× 493 1.4× 296 1.4× 58 0.7× 82 1.0× 54 896
Ji Hyun Yang South Korea 14 473 0.9× 250 0.7× 277 1.3× 64 0.7× 73 0.8× 76 814
Sean Seaman United States 13 363 0.7× 219 0.6× 167 0.8× 87 1.0× 63 0.7× 29 632
Bobbie Seppelt United States 16 910 1.8× 511 1.4× 401 1.8× 116 1.3× 102 1.2× 37 1.2k
Joonwoo Son South Korea 15 316 0.6× 165 0.5× 194 0.9× 46 0.5× 78 0.9× 48 584
Yiqi Zhang United States 16 394 0.8× 347 1.0× 230 1.1× 37 0.4× 37 0.4× 83 777
Raymond J. Kiefer United States 15 571 1.1× 497 1.4× 331 1.5× 40 0.5× 93 1.1× 42 922
Pavlo Bazilinskyy Netherlands 16 831 1.6× 497 1.4× 305 1.4× 33 0.4× 61 0.7× 48 986
Vicki L. Neale United States 11 536 1.1× 644 1.8× 351 1.6× 57 0.7× 100 1.2× 30 1.1k
Brian Mok United States 15 793 1.6× 338 0.9× 296 1.4× 51 0.6× 58 0.7× 31 971

Countries citing papers authored by Linda Angell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Linda Angell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linda Angell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linda Angell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Linda Angell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Linda Angell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Linda Angell. The network helps show where Linda Angell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Linda Angell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Linda Angell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Linda Angell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Linda Angell. Linda Angell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Domeyer, Joshua, et al.. (2024). Naturalistic driving analysis of situational, behavioral, and psychosocial determinants of speeding. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 207. 107751–107751. 1 indexed citations
2.
Angell, Linda, et al.. (2022). A Framework for Building Comprehensive Driver Profiles. Information. 13(2). 61–61. 9 indexed citations
3.
Zhang, Yu, Linda Angell, & Shan Bao. (2021). A fallback mechanism or a commander? A discussion about the role and skill needs of future drivers within partially automated vehicles. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. 9. 100337–100337. 5 indexed citations
4.
Landry, Steven J., Bobbie Seppelt, Luca Russo, et al.. (2020). Perceptions of Two Unique Lane Centering Systems: An FOT Interview Analysis. SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series. 1. 1 indexed citations
5.
Fridman, Lex, Michael Glazer, Jack Terwilliger, et al.. (2017). MIT Autonomous Vehicle Technology Study: Large-Scale Deep Learning Based Analysis of Driver Behavior and Interaction with Automation. arXiv (Cornell University). 56 indexed citations
6.
Angell, Linda, et al.. (2017). Can You Still Look Up? Remote Rotary Controller vs. Touchscreen. SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series. 1. 4 indexed citations
7.
Seppelt, Bobbie, Sean Seaman, Joonbum Lee, et al.. (2017). Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 107. 48–62. 55 indexed citations
8.
Angell, Linda, et al.. (2016). Workshop on Situation Awareness in Automotive Evaluation & Design. 221–224.
9.
McGehee, Daniel V., Cheryl Roe, Linda Ng Boyle, et al.. (2016). The Wagging Foot of Uncertainty: Data Collection and Reduction Methods for Examining Foot Pedal Behavior in Naturalistic Driving. 4(2). 289–294. 16 indexed citations
10.
Lee, Joonbum, Bryan Reimer, Bruce Mehler, et al.. (2015). Analyses of Glance Patterns of Older and Younger Drivers During Visual-Manual Human-Machine Interface Interaction. Transportation Research Board 94th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board. 3 indexed citations
11.
Owens, Justin M., Linda Angell, Jonathan M. Hankey, James Foley, & Kazutoshi Ebe. (2015). Creation of the Naturalistic Engagement in Secondary Tasks (NEST) distracted driving dataset. Journal of Safety Research. 54. 33.e29–36. 23 indexed citations
12.
Lee, Joonbum, Bryan Reimer, Bruce Mehler, et al.. (2015). Analyses of glance patterns of older and younger drivers during a visual-manual interaction. 1 indexed citations
13.
Angell, Linda, et al.. (2015). An Exploration of Driver Behavior During Turns at Intersections (for Drivers in Different Age Groups). VTechWorks (Virginia Tech). 5 indexed citations
14.
Angell, Linda, Miguel A. Pérez, & Susan Soccolich. (2015). Identification of Cognitive Load in Naturalistic Driving. VTechWorks (Virginia Tech). 8 indexed citations
15.
Zhang, Yu, et al.. (2013). An Evaluation of the Visual Demands of Portable Telematics in Young Adult Drivers. 1 indexed citations
16.
Foley, James, Richard A. Young, Linda Angell, & Joshua Domeyer. (2013). Towards Operationalizing Driver Distraction. 25 indexed citations
17.
Lee, John D., Shannon C. Roberts, Joshua Hoffman, & Linda Angell. (2012). Scrolling and Driving. Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 54(2). 250–263. 51 indexed citations
18.
Angell, Linda, et al.. (2011). Technology and Software Products for Preventing and Mitigating Driver Distraction. Ergonomics in Design The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications. 19(4). 28–29.
19.
Young, Richard A., Linda Angell, John M. Sullivan, Sean Seaman, & Li Hsieh. (2009). Validation of the Static Load Test for Event Detection During Hands-Free Conversation. 10 indexed citations
20.
Young, Richard A. & Linda Angell. (2003). The Dimensions of Driver Performance during Secondary Manual Tasks. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026