Liang Lu
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences top 2%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Food Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Thomas ReardonDavid ZilbermanAmir HeimanRob VosRuby T. NguyenJennifer IfftLenis Saweda O. Liverpool‐TasieBen Belton
- Topics
- Agricultural Innovations and Practices (8 papers)Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (5 papers)Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (5 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaSustainability
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndiaIsrael
In The Last Decade
Liang Lu
21 papers receiving 513 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Economics and Econometrics 141
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 111
- Strategy and Management 105
- Sociology and Political Science 105
- Food Science 88
Countries citing papers authored by Liang Lu
This map shows the geographic impact of Liang Lu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liang Lu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liang Lu more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Liang Lu
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liang Lu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liang Lu. The network helps show where Liang Lu may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Liang Lu
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Liang Lu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Liang Lu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Liang Lu. Liang Lu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 31 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 22 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | 78 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 70 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 30 | |
| 15 | 80 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | 28 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 14 |
About Liang Lu
Liang Lu is a scholar working on Business and International Management, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Soil Science, having authored 23 papers that have together received 537 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agricultural Innovations and Practices (8 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (5 papers) and Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (85 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (111 citations) and Marketing (76 citations). Liang Lu has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Reardon, David Zilberman, Amir Heiman, Rob Vos, Ruby T. Nguyen, Jennifer Ifft, Lenis Saweda O. Liverpool‐Tasie, Ben Belton, Levan Elbakidze and Alex Maas. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Sustainability.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.