Liam D. Delaney

80 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Liam D. Delaney
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • General Decision Sciences 65
  • Demography 154
  • Applied Psychology 64
  • Clinical Psychology 284
  • General Health Professions 131
Replace Joseph Price with:
Joseph Price United States
Alexander M. Schoemann United States
Stefanie Schurer Australia
Bonnie Ruth Strickland United States
Christopher J. Boyce United Kingdom
David Richter Germany
Jeanne Marecek United States
Lisa Fıksenbaum Canada
Susan R. Hutchinson United States
Katharine Helen Greenaway Australia
Liam D. Delaney relative to Joseph Price United States Joseph Price's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.4×
Joseph Price · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Liam D. Delaney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Liam D. Delaney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liam D. Delaney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liam D. Delaney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Liam D. Delaney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liam D. Delaney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liam D. Delaney. The network helps show where Liam D. Delaney may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Liam D. Delaney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Liam D. Delaney Line = papers co-authored together Liam D. Delaney links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 88 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020340
2 2015138
3 2011128
4 2012107
5 201292
6 201184
7 201881
8 201779
9 200972
10 201463
11 201662
12 201956
13 201151
14 201649
15 201849
16 201247
17 201643
18 201541
19 202040
20 201939

About Liam D. Delaney

Liam D. Delaney is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, General Health Professions, Accounting, Clinical Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 88 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Employment and Welfare Studies (7 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (5 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (4 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (65 citations), Demography (154 citations), Applied Psychology (64 citations), Clinical Psychology (284 citations) and General Health Professions (131 citations). Liam D. Delaney has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Daly, Leonhard K. Lades, Kate M. Laffan, James Patrick Smith, Roy Frederick Baumeister, Colm P. Harmon, Alex M. Wood, Orla Doyle, Christopher J. Boyce and Colm Harmon. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Health Psychology, Economics of Education Review, PLoS ONE and British Journal of Health Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact