L.G.M.M. Hustinx

418 total citations
14 papers, 243 citations indexed

About

L.G.M.M. Hustinx is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Literature and Literary Theory. According to data from OpenAlex, L.G.M.M. Hustinx has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 243 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Literature and Literary Theory. Recurrent topics in L.G.M.M. Hustinx's work include Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (5 papers), Employee Welfare and Language Studies (2 papers) and Media Influence and Health (2 papers). L.G.M.M. Hustinx is often cited by papers focused on Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (5 papers), Employee Welfare and Language Studies (2 papers) and Media Influence and Health (2 papers). L.G.M.M. Hustinx collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands. L.G.M.M. Hustinx's co-authors include Hans Hoeken, Wietske Vonk, M.J.P. van Mulken, Christine Liebrecht, Anneke de Graaf, Peter Jan Schellens, Alfons Maes and Jos Hornikx and has published in prestigious journals such as Communication Research, Human Communication Research and Journal of Language and Social Psychology.

In The Last Decade

L.G.M.M. Hustinx

12 papers receiving 217 citations

Peers

L.G.M.M. Hustinx
Zhuo Jing-Schmidt United States
Nicola Daly New Zealand
Astrid Ensslin United Kingdom
Steve Oswald Switzerland
Edda Weigand Germany
L.G.M.M. Hustinx
Citations per year, relative to L.G.M.M. Hustinx L.G.M.M. Hustinx (= 1×) peers Roland Mangold

Countries citing papers authored by L.G.M.M. Hustinx

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L.G.M.M. Hustinx's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L.G.M.M. Hustinx with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L.G.M.M. Hustinx more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L.G.M.M. Hustinx

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L.G.M.M. Hustinx. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L.G.M.M. Hustinx. The network helps show where L.G.M.M. Hustinx may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of L.G.M.M. Hustinx

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of L.G.M.M. Hustinx. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of L.G.M.M. Hustinx based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with L.G.M.M. Hustinx. L.G.M.M. Hustinx is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Liebrecht, Christine, L.G.M.M. Hustinx, & M.J.P. van Mulken. (2019). The Relative Power of Negativity: The Influence of Language Intensity on Perceived Strength. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 38(2). 170–193. 36 indexed citations
2.
Liebrecht, Christine, L.G.M.M. Hustinx, M.J.P. van Mulken, & Peter Jan Schellens. (2016). Krachtige taal. Radboud Repository (Radboud University). 38(1). 57–79. 3 indexed citations
4.
Graaf, Anneke de & L.G.M.M. Hustinx. (2011). The effect of reader-character similarity on identification and narrative persuasion. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 2 indexed citations
5.
Graaf, Anneke de & L.G.M.M. Hustinx. (2011). 5. The effect of story structure on emotion, transportation, and persuasion. Information Design Journal. 19(2). 142–154. 17 indexed citations
6.
Hoeken, Hans, Jos Hornikx, & L.G.M.M. Hustinx. (2009). Overtuigende teksten. Onderzoek en ontwerp. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 3 indexed citations
7.
Hoeken, Hans & L.G.M.M. Hustinx. (2009). When is Statistical Evidence Superior to Anecdotal Evidence in Supporting Probability Claims? The Role of Argument Type. Human Communication Research. 35(4). 491–510. 66 indexed citations
8.
Hoeken, Hans & L.G.M.M. Hustinx. (2007). The influence of additional information on the persuasiveness of flawed arguments by analogy. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 625–630. 6 indexed citations
9.
Hoeken, Hans & L.G.M.M. Hustinx. (2007). The Impact of Exemplars on Responsibility Stereotypes in Fund-Raising Letters. Communication Research. 34(6). 596–617. 20 indexed citations
10.
Hustinx, L.G.M.M., et al.. (2006). Argument quality in the Elaboration Likelihood Model: An empirical study of strong and weak arguments in a persuasive message. Radboud Repository (Radboud University). 651–658. 6 indexed citations
11.
Hustinx, L.G.M.M., et al.. (2006). Argumentkwaliteit en overtuigingskracht in het Elaboration Likelihood Model. Welke dimensies spelen een rol. Radboud Repository (Radboud University). 28. 39–52. 1 indexed citations
12.
Hoeken, Hans & L.G.M.M. Hustinx. (2003). The relative persuasiveness of anecdotal, statistical, causal, and expert evidence. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 497–502. 6 indexed citations
13.
Hustinx, L.G.M.M., et al.. (1993). Discourse functions of NP-anaphora : linguistic and text-analytic form/function analysis of NP-anaphora. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 2 indexed citations
14.
Vonk, Wietske, et al.. (1992). The use of referential expressions in structuring discourse. Language and Cognitive Processes. 7(3-4). 301–333. 75 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026