Lewis M. Barker
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 5%
- Sensory Systems top 1%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Food Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Michael DomjanMichael R. BestJames C. SmithCharles A. WeaverFrederick J. SimoonsDale L. SmithCharles L. Salzberg
- Topics
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (5 papers)Memory and Neural Mechanisms (4 papers)Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Lewis M. Barker
21 papers receiving 912 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Nutrition and Dietetics 324
- Sensory Systems 303
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 276
- Cognitive Neuroscience 262
- Food Science 156
Countries citing papers authored by Lewis M. Barker
This map shows the geographic impact of Lewis M. Barker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lewis M. Barker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lewis M. Barker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lewis M. Barker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lewis M. Barker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lewis M. Barker. The network helps show where Lewis M. Barker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lewis M. Barker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lewis M. Barker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lewis M. Barker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lewis M. Barker. Lewis M. Barker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | Learning and Behavior: Biological, Psychological and Sociocultural Perspectives | 9 |
| 4 | Learning and Behavior: A Psychobiological Perspective | 5 |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 32 | |
| 7 | The Psychobiology of Human Food Selection | 227 |
| 8 | Geography and genetics as factors in the psychobiology of human food selection. | 8 |
| 9 | Human food selection: the interaction of biology, culture and individual experience. | 80 |
| 10 | Building memories for foods. | 6 |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | Learning mechanisms in food selectionbreakdown → | 399 |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 64 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | 79 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Lewis M. Barker
Lewis M. Barker is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Behavioral Neuroscience and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 21 papers that have together received 997 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (5 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (4 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (303 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (324 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (276 citations). Lewis M. Barker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Domjan, Michael R. Best, James C. Smith, Charles A. Weaver, Frederick J. Simoons, Dale L. Smith and Charles L. Salzberg. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Physiology & Behavior and Learning and Motivation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.