Leo Chen
Impact in
- Neurology top 5%
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Neurological disorders and treatments
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 10%
- Pain Management and Treatment
Papers in ⓘ
- Neurology 15
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies 14
- Neurological disorders and treatments 6
-
- Pain Management and Treatment 3
- Co-authors
- Paul B. Fitzgerald (9 shared papers)Kate E. Hoy (7 shared papers)Hannah Dobson (1 shared paper)Jayashri Kulkarni (2 shared papers)Aidan Burrell (1 shared paper)Charles B. Malpas (1 shared paper)Caroline Gurvich (1 shared paper)Toby Winton‐Brown (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Brain stimulation (4 papers)Blood (2 papers)Depression and Anxiety (2 papers)CHEST Journal (2 papers)Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Leo Chen
24 papers receiving 492 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Neurology 240
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 56
- Clinical Psychology 140
- Cognitive Neuroscience 111
- Psychiatry and Mental health 83
Countries citing papers authored by Leo Chen
This map shows the geographic impact of Leo Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leo Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leo Chen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Leo Chen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leo Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leo Chen. The network helps show where Leo Chen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Leo Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 137 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 55 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 50 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 39 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 38 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 36 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 26 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 25 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 22 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2025 | 1 |
About Leo Chen
Leo Chen is a scholar working on Neurology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Radiation, having authored 29 papers that have together received 498 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (14 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (6 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (6 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (3 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (3 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (3 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (3 papers) and Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (240 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (56 citations), Clinical Psychology (140 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (111 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (83 citations). Leo Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Paul B. Fitzgerald, Kate E. Hoy, Hannah Dobson, Jayashri Kulkarni, Aidan Burrell, Charles B. Malpas, Caroline Gurvich, Toby Winton‐Brown, Abdul‐Rahman Hudaib and Zafiris J. Daskalakis. Their work appears in journals such as Brain stimulation, Blood, Depression and Anxiety, CHEST Journal and Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.