Brain stimulation

82.0k citations
3.3k papers · indexed · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Neurology top 0.5%
    • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
    • Neurological disorders and treatments
    • Vestibular and auditory disorders
    • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
    • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
    • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Papers in

    • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies 1.8k
    • Neurological disorders and treatments 575
    • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 620
    • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 549
    • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 343
    • Neural dynamics and brain function 286

Brain stimulation

2.9k papers receiving 81.0k citations

Peers

Brain stimulation
Comparison fields: 5 of 195
  • Neurology 55.1k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 41.5k
  • Neurology 14.1k
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 5.2k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 14.6k
Replace Nature Reviews Neurology with:
Nature Reviews Neurology United States
Brain Behavior and Immunity United States
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology United States
Progress in brain research United States
Progress in Neurobiology United States
Current Opinion in Neurology United States
Neurorehabilitation and neural repair United States
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience United States
Journal of Neuropsychiatry United States
Journal of Neuroinflammation United States
Brain stimulation relative to Nature Reviews Neurology United States Nature Reviews Neurology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Nature Reviews Neurology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Brain stimulation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Brain stimulation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Brain stimulation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brain stimulation more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Brain stimulation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Brain stimulation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Brain stimulation.

About Brain stimulation

The 3.3k papers published in Brain stimulation in the last decades have received a total of 82.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Brain stimulation usually cover Neurology (2.0k papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.6k papers), Neurology (637 papers), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (214 papers) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (648 papers) specifically the topics of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (1.8k papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (620 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (575 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (549 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (470 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (343 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (300 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (286 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Brain stimulation are Michael A. Nitsche, Walter Paulus, Marom Bikson, Álvaro Pascual‐Leone, Paul B. Fitzgerald, John C. Rothwell, Ulf Ziemann, Felipe Fregni, Zafiris J. Daskalakis and Mark S. George.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026