Janice Russell
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Stephen TouyzP. J. V. BeumontSuzanne AbrahamChristopher ThorntonPeter BeumontRosalyn A. GriffithsElizabeth RiegerDavid E. Schotte
- Topics
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors (80 papers)Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (28 papers)Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Janice Russell
103 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Clinical Psychology 2.1k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 513
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 469
- Sociology and Political Science 342
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 292
Countries citing papers authored by Janice Russell
This map shows the geographic impact of Janice Russell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janice Russell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janice Russell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Janice Russell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janice Russell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janice Russell. The network helps show where Janice Russell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janice Russell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janice Russell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janice Russell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janice Russell. Janice Russell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 54 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 42 | |
| 16 | 80 | |
| 17 | 127 | |
| 18 | 28 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 14 |
About Janice Russell
Janice Russell is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pharmacy and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 108 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (80 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (28 papers) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (2.1k citations), Pharmacy (235 citations) and Applied Psychology (194 citations). Janice Russell has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Touyz, P. J. V. Beumont, Suzanne Abraham, Christopher Thornton, Peter Beumont, Rosalyn A. Griffiths, Elizabeth Rieger, David E. Schotte, Sarah Maguire and Maree J. Abbott. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Science Translational Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.