Leigh Anne Hohlstein

514 total citations
8 papers, 408 citations indexed

About

Leigh Anne Hohlstein is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pharmacy. According to data from OpenAlex, Leigh Anne Hohlstein has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 408 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Clinical Psychology, 3 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 2 papers in Pharmacy. Recurrent topics in Leigh Anne Hohlstein's work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (7 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers) and Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (2 papers). Leigh Anne Hohlstein is often cited by papers focused on Eating Disorders and Behaviors (7 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers) and Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (2 papers). Leigh Anne Hohlstein collaborates with scholars based in United States. Leigh Anne Hohlstein's co-authors include Gregory T. Smith, Jana G. Atlas, Teri Pearlstein, Denis M. McCarthy, Camil Fuchs, Martín Keller, John Read, Caron Zlotnick, M. Tracie Shea and Richard Kaczynski and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Assessment, Addictive Behaviors and International Journal of Eating Disorders.

In The Last Decade

Leigh Anne Hohlstein

8 papers receiving 379 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Leigh Anne Hohlstein United States	7	369	100	74	56	51	8	408
Marilyn Stuckey United States	8	421 1.1×	136 1.4×	45 0.6×	120 2.1×	33 0.6×	8	474
C. J. Davis United States	11	500 1.4×	144 1.4×	37 0.5×	62 1.1×	125 2.5×	11	524
Douglas W. Bunnell United States	8	353 1.0×	65 0.7×	27 0.4×	46 0.8×	44 0.9×	13	371
Traci L. Davis United States	8	616 1.7×	159 1.6×	61 0.8×	136 2.4×	70 1.4×	10	639
Lauren O. Pollack United States	9	408 1.1×	123 1.2×	57 0.8×	66 1.2×	63 1.2×	10	467
Juliet K. Rosewall New Zealand	10	304 0.8×	148 1.5×	39 0.5×	36 0.6×	112 2.2×	11	350
Fátima Ferreiro Spain	7	308 0.8×	108 1.1×	33 0.4×	59 1.1×	62 1.2×	7	353
Therese Fostervold Mathisen Norway	13	316 0.9×	137 1.4×	55 0.7×	70 1.3×	41 0.8×	41	472
Edward P. Tyson United States	3	333 0.9×	99 1.0×	36 0.5×	70 1.3×	57 1.1×	4	375
Kassandra Gratwick‐Sarll Australia	10	453 1.2×	157 1.6×	43 0.6×	74 1.3×	137 2.7×	12	491

Countries citing papers authored by Leigh Anne Hohlstein

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leigh Anne Hohlstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leigh Anne Hohlstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leigh Anne Hohlstein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leigh Anne Hohlstein

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leigh Anne Hohlstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leigh Anne Hohlstein. The network helps show where Leigh Anne Hohlstein may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leigh Anne Hohlstein

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leigh Anne Hohlstein. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leigh Anne Hohlstein based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leigh Anne Hohlstein. Leigh Anne Hohlstein is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Hohlstein, Leigh Anne, et al.. (2003). A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of fluvoxamine in binge eating disorder: a high placebo response. Archives of Women s Mental Health. 6(2). 147–151. 56 indexed citations

2.

Atlas, Jana G., et al.. (2002). Similarities and differences between Caucasian and African American college women on eating and dieting expectancies, bulimic symptoms, dietary restraint, and disinhibition. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 32(3). 326–334. 50 indexed citations

3.

Hohlstein, Leigh Anne, Gregory T. Smith, & Jana G. Atlas. (1998). An application of expectancy theory to eating disorders: Development and validation of measures of eating and dieting expectancies.. Psychological Assessment. 10(1). 49–58. 209 indexed citations

4.

Hohlstein, Leigh Anne, Gregory T. Smith, & Jana G. Atlas. (1998). An application of expectancy theory to eating disorders: Development and validation of measures of eating and dieting expectancies.. Psychological Assessment. 10(1). 49–58. 5 indexed citations

5.

Zlotnick, Caron, et al.. (1996). The relationship between sexual abuse and eating pathology. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 20(2). 129–134. 35 indexed citations

6.

Smith, Gregory T., Leigh Anne Hohlstein, & Jana G. Atlas. (1992). Accuracy of self-reported weight: Covariation with binger or restrainer status and eating disorder symptomatology. Addictive Behaviors. 17(1). 1–8. 28 indexed citations

7.

Abbey, Antonia, et al.. (1990). Substance abuse prevention for second graders: Are they too young to benefit?. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 11(2). 149–162. 13 indexed citations

8.

Hohlstein, Leigh Anne, et al.. (1986). Oral glucose tolerance in bulimia. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 5(1). 157–160. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact