Leah M. Kaufmann
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty top 2%
- Pharmacy top 5%
- Co-authors
- Xochitl de la Piedad GarciaNick HaslamBen WilliamsLeah BrennanHugh BidstrupJennifer WhelanKim PetersStephen Loughnan
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers)Eating Disorders and Behaviors (4 papers)Obesity and Health Practices (4 papers)
- Journals
- Psychological BulletinInternational Journal of ObesityPersonality and Individual Differences
- Partner nations
- AustraliaNetherlandsSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Leah M. Kaufmann
23 papers receiving 469 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Clinical Psychology 160
- Social Psychology 150
- Sociology and Political Science 121
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 112
- Pharmacy 92
Countries citing papers authored by Leah M. Kaufmann
This map shows the geographic impact of Leah M. Kaufmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leah M. Kaufmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leah M. Kaufmann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Leah M. Kaufmann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leah M. Kaufmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leah M. Kaufmann. The network helps show where Leah M. Kaufmann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leah M. Kaufmann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leah M. Kaufmann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leah M. Kaufmann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leah M. Kaufmann. Leah M. Kaufmann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 89 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 39 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 57 | |
| 18 | 46 | |
| 19 | 136 | |
| 20 | 31 |
About Leah M. Kaufmann
Leah M. Kaufmann is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Social Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 490 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (4 papers) and Obesity and Health Practices (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (92 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (112 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (38 citations). Leah M. Kaufmann has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Netherlands and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Xochitl de la Piedad Garcia, Nick Haslam, Ben Williams, Leah Brennan, Hugh Bidstrup, Jennifer Whelan, Kim Peters, Stephen Loughnan, Joel Anderson and Samuel Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Bulletin, International Journal of Obesity and Personality and Individual Differences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.