Lawrence J. Friedman
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- History top 1%
- Education top 10%
- Co-authors
- George M. FredricksonJames W. TrentKathleen W. JonesWaldo E. MartinSoma HewaPete DanielJames W. ButtonReginald Horsman
- Topics
- Race, History, and American Society (11 papers)American Constitutional Law and Politics (9 papers)Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Lawrence J. Friedman
42 papers receiving 530 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Sociology and Political Science 298
- Clinical Psychology 133
- Political Science and International Relations 129
- History 100
- Education 68
Countries citing papers authored by Lawrence J. Friedman
This map shows the geographic impact of Lawrence J. Friedman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lawrence J. Friedman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lawrence J. Friedman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lawrence J. Friedman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lawrence J. Friedman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lawrence J. Friedman. The network helps show where Lawrence J. Friedman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lawrence J. Friedman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lawrence J. Friedman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lawrence J. Friedman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lawrence J. Friedman. Lawrence J. Friedman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | In Defense of Corporate Criminal Liability | 16 |
| 3 | 82 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | Adult development theories and Erik Erikson's life-cycle model. | 2 |
| 8 | 32 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 119 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | The therapeutic alliance. | 50 |
About Lawrence J. Friedman
Lawrence J. Friedman is a scholar working on General Psychology, Music and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 50 papers that have together received 732 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Race, History, and American Society (11 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (9 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (38 citations), History (100 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (13 citations). Lawrence J. Friedman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include George M. Fredrickson, James W. Trent, Kathleen W. Jones, Waldo E. Martin, Soma Hewa, Pete Daniel, James W. Button, Reginald Horsman, Saül Rosenzweig and Hugh Davis Graham. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History and The Canadian Journal of Sociology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.