James W. Trent
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Education top 5%
- Safety Research top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- History top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Gerald N. GrobPaul K. LongmoreLeland L. MedskerLawrence J. FriedmanLeila ZenderlandJoel A. DevineJames D. WrightBeth A. Rubin
- Topics
- Canadian Identity and History (4 papers)Catholicism and Religious Studies (4 papers)Medical History and Research (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
James W. Trent
27 papers receiving 770 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Sociology and Political Science 380
- Education 270
- Safety Research 255
- Clinical Psychology 224
- History 151
Countries citing papers authored by James W. Trent
This map shows the geographic impact of James W. Trent's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James W. Trent with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James W. Trent more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James W. Trent
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James W. Trent. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James W. Trent. The network helps show where James W. Trent may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James W. Trent
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James W. Trent. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James W. Trent based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James W. Trent. James W. Trent is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | Mental retardation in America : a historical reader | 31 |
| 4 | 59 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 239 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 82 | |
| 11 | 65 | |
| 12 | 41 | |
| 13 | Inventing the Feeble Mind: A History of Intellectual Disability in the United States | 11 |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | The Study of Junior Colleges. Volume I, Roles and Realities of Community Colleges: An Analysis of the Literature. | 1 |
| 16 | The Decision to Go to College: An Accumulative, Multivariate Process. | 9 |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | Beyond High School. | 75 |
| 19 | Beyond high school : a study of 10,000 high school graduates | 12 |
| 20 | Personal Factors in College Choice. | 1 |
About James W. Trent
James W. Trent is a scholar working on History, Education and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Canadian Identity and History (4 papers), Catholicism and Religious Studies (4 papers) and Medical History and Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (255 citations), History (151 citations) and General Psychology (15 citations). James W. Trent has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gerald N. Grob, Paul K. Longmore, Leland L. Medsker, Lawrence J. Friedman, Leila Zenderland, Joel A. Devine, James D. Wright, Beth A. Rubin, Julie V. Brown and Edward Joseph Shoben. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Social Forces and The American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.