Lavier Gomes
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Neurology top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Leanne M. WilliamsAnthony HarrisThomas J. WhitfordTom F.D. FarrowStuart M. GrieveJohn BrennanEvian GordonSheryl Foster
- Topics
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (9 papers)Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers)Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaNeuroImageAmerican Journal of Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Lavier Gomes
36 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Cognitive Neuroscience 477
- Psychiatry and Mental health 468
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 385
- Neurology 135
- Molecular Biology 114
Countries citing papers authored by Lavier Gomes
This map shows the geographic impact of Lavier Gomes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lavier Gomes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lavier Gomes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lavier Gomes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lavier Gomes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lavier Gomes. The network helps show where Lavier Gomes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lavier Gomes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lavier Gomes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lavier Gomes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lavier Gomes. Lavier Gomes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19 | |
| 2 | 25 | |
| 3 | 35 | |
| 4 | 85 | |
| 5 | 36 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 95 | |
| 9 | 32 | |
| 10 | 116 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | 83 | |
| 16 | 126 | |
| 17 | 176 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 16 |
About Lavier Gomes
Lavier Gomes is a scholar working on Microbiology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (9 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers) and Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (468 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (477 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (44 citations). Lavier Gomes has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Leanne M. Williams, Anthony Harris, Thomas J. Whitford, Tom F.D. Farrow, Stuart M. Grieve, John Brennan, Evian Gordon, Sheryl Foster, Mayuresh S. Korgaonkar and Isabella A. Breukelaar. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, NeuroImage and American Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.