Ming‐Wei Lin

835 citations
48 papers · 404 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Ming‐Wei Lin

43 papers receiving 402 citations

Peers

Ming‐Wei Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Rheumatology 134
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 69
  • Speech and Hearing 22
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 45
  • Genetics 30
Replace Nesrin Karabul with:
Nesrin Karabul Germany
Li‐Ping Tsai Taiwan
Ryszard Ślężak Poland
Nolwenn Juhel France
Wolfanga L. Boson Brazil
F. Hanefeld Germany
Xiaorong Shao United States
Samu Kurki Finland
Joel C. Kirsh Canada
Ming‐Wei Lin relative to Nesrin Karabul Germany Nesrin Karabul's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Nesrin Karabul · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming‐Wei Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming‐Wei Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming‐Wei Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming‐Wei Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming‐Wei Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming‐Wei Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming‐Wei Lin. The network helps show where Ming‐Wei Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming‐Wei Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming‐Wei Lin Line = papers co-authored together Ming‐Wei Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201552
2 201739
3 201731
4 200027
5 201227
6 202319
7 201115
8 201413
9 202012
10 201612
11 201412
12 201411
13 201111
14 200311
15 202310
16 20048
17 20128
18 20198
19 20137
20 20107

About Ming‐Wei Lin

Ming‐Wei Lin is a scholar working on Rheumatology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology and Immunology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 404 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (13 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (10 papers), Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases (7 papers), Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (6 papers), Menstrual Health and Disorders (3 papers), Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema (3 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (3 papers) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rheumatology (134 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (69 citations), Speech and Hearing (22 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (45 citations) and Genetics (30 citations). Ming‐Wei Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Taiwan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David A. Fulcher, Adrian Y. S. Lee, Dan Suan, Mark Schifter, Winny Varikatt, Jing Hua Zhao, David Curtis, Julian J. Bosco, Pak C. Sham and Allison Tong. Their work appears in journals such as Pathology, PLoS ONE, Arthritis Care & Research, Frontiers in Neurology and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact