Laurel Herbst

559 citations
9 papers · 263 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Laurel Herbst

9 papers receiving 243 citations

Peers

Laurel Herbst
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 146
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 119
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 115
  • Physiology 68
  • General Health Professions 50
Replace Mary Brooksbank with:
Mary Brooksbank Australia
Stavroula Georgaki Greece
Jordi Trelis Spain
Michaela Bercovitch Israel
Paulo Reis-Pina Portugal
Beth Popp United States
Marcin Chwistek United States
Antonio Agnello Italy
Alfredo Covarrubias‐Gómez Mexico
Amanda Caruselli Italy
Laurel Herbst relative to Mary Brooksbank Australia Mary Brooksbank's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mary Brooksbank · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Laurel Herbst

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laurel Herbst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laurel Herbst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laurel Herbst more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laurel Herbst

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laurel Herbst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laurel Herbst. The network helps show where Laurel Herbst may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Laurel Herbst, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Laurel Herbst Line = papers co-authored together Laurel Herbst links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1
Intrathecal drug delivery for the management of cancer pain: a multidisciplinary consensus of best clinical practices.
200678
2 200464
3 199839
4 199237
5 199115
6 200413
7 20017
8 19936
9 19964

About Laurel Herbst

Laurel Herbst is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Surgery and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 9 papers that have together received 263 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (4 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (2 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (2 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (1 paper), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (1 paper) and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (146 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (119 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (115 citations), Physiology (68 citations) and General Health Professions (50 citations). Laurel Herbst has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Linda Strause, Wendy J. Evans, Karen Garman, Charles F. von Gunten, Harry G. Bluestein, Jennifer J. Kiser, Michael S. Gordon, Gerhard M. Friehs, Lisa Stearns and Stuart Du Pen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Palliative Care, Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, Cancer Nursing, Academic Medicine and Cancer Investigation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact