Stuart Du Pen

764 total citations
9 papers, 492 citations indexed

About

Stuart Du Pen is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Surgery and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Stuart Du Pen has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 492 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 7 papers in Surgery and 3 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Stuart Du Pen's work include Pain Management and Opioid Use (8 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (5 papers) and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers). Stuart Du Pen is often cited by papers focused on Pain Management and Opioid Use (8 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (5 papers) and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers). Stuart Du Pen collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Belgium. Stuart Du Pen's co-authors include Samuel J. Hassenbusch, Timothy R. Deer, Gary J. Bennett, Kim J. Burchiel, K. Dean Willis, Richard Rauck, Tony L. Yaksh, Eric Buchser, Jan Maeyaert and Russell K. Portenoy and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Pain Medicine and Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface.

In The Last Decade

Stuart Du Pen

9 papers receiving 454 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Stuart Du Pen United States	9	371	268	193	115	57	9	492
Elena Català Spain	5	411 1.1×	238 0.9×	128 0.7×	234 2.0×	29 0.5×	7	529
Ronald Kanner United States	9	220 0.6×	110 0.4×	125 0.6×	127 1.1×	66 1.2×	23	424
Leland Lou United States	11	256 0.7×	169 0.6×	135 0.7×	56 0.5×	78 1.4×	14	422
D. Olshwang Israel	10	431 1.2×	496 1.9×	287 1.5×	131 1.1×	68 1.2×	18	673
Clare Rayment United Kingdom	4	250 0.7×	73 0.3×	224 1.2×	105 0.9×	10 0.2×	14	387
Thomas C. Sist United States	9	90 0.2×	95 0.4×	118 0.6×	60 0.5×	75 1.3×	13	411
J. Pérez‐Cajaraville Spain	8	154 0.4×	62 0.2×	134 0.7×	48 0.4×	26 0.5×	30	365
I. Elias Veizi United States	8	167 0.5×	95 0.4×	80 0.4×	53 0.5×	19 0.3×	9	220
A. P. Rubin United Kingdom	12	116 0.3×	348 1.3×	75 0.4×	29 0.3×	62 1.1×	19	619
Bryan C. Hoelzer United States	13	237 0.6×	153 0.6×	75 0.4×	25 0.2×	109 1.9×	36	429

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart Du Pen

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart Du Pen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart Du Pen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart Du Pen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart Du Pen

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart Du Pen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart Du Pen. The network helps show where Stuart Du Pen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stuart Du Pen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stuart Du Pen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stuart Du Pen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stuart Du Pen. Stuart Du Pen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Stearns, Lisa, Richard L. Boortz-Marx, Stuart Du Pen, et al.. (2006). Intrathecal drug delivery for the management of cancer pain: a multidisciplinary consensus of best clinical practices.. PubMed. 3(6). 399–408. 78 indexed citations

2.

Pen, Stuart Du, et al.. (2006). Intrathecal Hydromorphone for Intractable Nonmalignant Pain: A Retrospective Study. Pain Medicine. 7(1). 10–15. 27 indexed citations

3.

Hassenbusch, Samuel J., Kim J. Burchiel, Robert J. Coffey, et al.. (2002). Management of Intrathecal Catheter-Tip Inflammatory Masses: A Consensus Statement. Pain Medicine. 3(4). 313–323. 78 indexed citations

4.

Bennett, Gary J., Timothy R. Deer, Stuart Du Pen, et al.. (2000). Future Directions in the Management of Pain by Intraspinal Drug Delivery. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 20(2). S44–S50. 31 indexed citations

5.

Bennett, Gary J., Kim J. Burchiel, Eric Buchser, et al.. (2000). Clinical Guidelines for Intraspinal Infusion. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 20(2). S37–S43. 85 indexed citations

6.

Pen, Stuart Du, et al.. (2000). An educational implementation of a cancer pain algorithm for ambulatory care. Pain Management Nursing. 1(4). 116–128. 37 indexed citations

7.

Bennett, Gary J., Kim J. Burchiel, Eric Buchser, et al.. (2000). Evidence-Based Review of the Literature on Intrathecal Delivery of Pain Medication. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 20(2). S12–S36. 114 indexed citations

8.

Hassenbusch, Samuel J., et al.. (1999). Alternative Intrathecal Agents for the Treatment of Pain. Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface. 2(2). 85–91. 23 indexed citations

9.

Pen, Stuart Du. (1999). Complications of neuraxial infusion in cancer patients.. PubMed. 13(5 Suppl 2). 45–51. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact