Beth Popp

405 citations
12 papers · 243 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Beth Popp

10 papers receiving 227 citations

Peers

Beth Popp
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 126
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 114
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 85
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 14
  • General Health Professions 55
Replace Paulo Reis-Pina with:
Paulo Reis-Pina Portugal
Jordi Trelis Spain
Morten Thronæs Norway
Michaela Bercovitch Israel
Mary Brooksbank Australia
Silvia Librada Flores Spain
Marcin Chwistek United States
Laurel Herbst United States
Amanda Caruselli Italy
Katie Fitzgerald Jones United States
Beth Popp relative to Paulo Reis-Pina Portugal Paulo Reis-Pina's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Paulo Reis-Pina · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beth Popp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Popp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Popp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Popp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Popp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Popp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Popp. The network helps show where Beth Popp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Beth Popp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beth Popp Line = papers co-authored together Beth Popp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 1995139
2 202151
3 201125
4 20188
5 20208
6 20176
7 20132
8 20222
9 20241
10 20231
11 20230
12 20240

About Beth Popp

Beth Popp is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 12 papers that have together received 243 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (2 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (2 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (1 paper) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (126 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (114 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (85 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (14 citations) and General Health Professions (55 citations). Beth Popp has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul J. Tiseo, Victor T. Chang, Kathleen M. Foley, Nathan I. Cherny, R. Portenoy, Gerri Frager, Jane Ingham, Alan B. Astrow, Don S. Dizon and Areej El‐Jawahri. Their work appears in journals such as JCO Oncology Practice, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Cancer and Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact