Laura L. Williams
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Surgery
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Michael W. VaseyEric L. DaleidenDaniel J. FlanneryLisa M. BrownAlexander T. VazsonyiArthur C. FleischerHoward W. JonesD M Kepple
- Topics
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (7 papers)Avian ecology and behavior (3 papers)Genital Health and Disease (3 papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyArchives of Biochemistry and BiophysicsPsychological Assessment
- Partner nations
- United StatesChileDenmark
In The Last Decade
Laura L. Williams
36 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
- Clinical Psychology 292
- Surgery 239
- Reproductive Medicine 213
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 169
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 156
Countries citing papers authored by Laura L. Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Laura L. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura L. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura L. Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Laura L. Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura L. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura L. Williams. The network helps show where Laura L. Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laura L. Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laura L. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laura L. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laura L. Williams. Laura L. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 86 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 57 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 158 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | 39 | |
| 10 | 40 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 58 | |
| 14 | 211 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 70 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 81 | |
| 19 | 26 | |
| 20 | 33 |
About Laura L. Williams
Laura L. Williams is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Ecological Modeling and Complementary and Manual Therapy, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (7 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (3 papers) and Genital Health and Disease (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (213 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (156 citations) and Clinical Psychology (292 citations). Laura L. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Chile and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Michael W. Vasey, Eric L. Daleiden, Daniel J. Flannery, Lisa M. Brown, Alexander T. Vazsonyi, Arthur C. Fleischer, Howard W. Jones, D M Kepple, William T. Creasman and William H. Rodgers. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics and Psychological Assessment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.