William T. Creasman
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 0.01%
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments 98
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments 25
- Reproductive Medicine top 0.01%
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment 92
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment 20
- Internal Medicine top 1%
- Epidemiology top 0.5%
- Cervical Cancer and HPV Research 44
- Oncology top 0.5%
- Cancer Risks and Factors 12
-
- Estrogen and related hormone effects 33
-
- Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies 11
- Co-authors
- Brian N. BundyJohn A. BlessingC. Paul MorrowPhilip J. DiSaiaPaul B. HellerJames E. GrahamHoward D. HomesleyDaniel L. Clarke‐Pearson
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
William T. Creasman
239 papers receiving 16.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 10.9k
- Reproductive Medicine 8.3k
- Internal Medicine 501
- Epidemiology 3.8k
- Oncology 2.9k
Countries citing papers authored by William T. Creasman
This map shows the geographic impact of William T. Creasman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William T. Creasman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William T. Creasman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William T. Creasman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William T. Creasman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William T. Creasman. The network helps show where William T. Creasman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William T. Creasman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 21 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 92 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 188 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 11 | |
| 10 | Carcinoma of the vulva. | 2001 | 23 |
| 11 | Carcinoma of the ovary. | 2001 | 146 |
| 12 | 2001 | 73 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 51 | |
| 14 | 1999 | 19 | |
| 15 | 1997 | 45 | |
| 16 | 1995 | 30 | |
| 17 | Biology, diagnosis and management | 1992 | 6 |
| 18 | 1991 | 55 | |
| 19 | Computed tomography in evaluation of extrapelvic lymphadenopathy in carcinoma of the cervix. | 1985 | 33 |
| 20 | 1979 | 71 |
About William T. Creasman
William T. Creasman is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Internal Medicine, having authored 243 papers that have together received 17.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (98 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (92 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (44 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (33 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (25 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (20 papers), Cancer Risks and Factors (12 papers) and Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (10.9k citations), Reproductive Medicine (8.3k citations) and Internal Medicine (501 citations). William T. Creasman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Brian N. Bundy, John A. Blessing, C. Paul Morrow, Philip J. DiSaia, Paul B. Heller, James E. Graham, Howard D. Homesley, Daniel L. Clarke‐Pearson, Francis J. Major and Franco Odicino. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Journal of Clinical Oncology and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.