William T. Creasman
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 0.01%
- Reproductive Medicine top 0.01%
- Epidemiology top 0.5%
- Surgery top 0.5%
- Oncology top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Brian N. BundyJohn A. BlessingC. Paul MorrowPhilip J. DiSaiaPaul B. HellerJames E. GrahamHoward D. HomesleyDaniel L. Clarke‐Pearson
- Topics
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (98 papers)Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (92 papers)Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (44 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
William T. Creasman
239 papers receiving 16.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 10.9k
- Reproductive Medicine 8.3k
- Epidemiology 3.8k
- Surgery 3.8k
- Oncology 2.9k
Countries citing papers authored by William T. Creasman
This map shows the geographic impact of William T. Creasman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William T. Creasman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William T. Creasman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William T. Creasman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William T. Creasman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William T. Creasman. The network helps show where William T. Creasman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William T. Creasman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William T. Creasman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William T. Creasman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William T. Creasman. William T. Creasman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 92 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 188 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | Carcinoma of the vulva. | 23 |
| 11 | Carcinoma of the ovary. | 146 |
| 12 | 73 | |
| 13 | 51 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 45 | |
| 16 | 30 | |
| 17 | Biology, diagnosis and management | 6 |
| 18 | 55 | |
| 19 | Computed tomography in evaluation of extrapelvic lymphadenopathy in carcinoma of the cervix. | 33 |
| 20 | 71 |
About William T. Creasman
William T. Creasman is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Internal Medicine, having authored 243 papers that have together received 17.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (98 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (92 papers) and Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (44 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (10.9k citations), Reproductive Medicine (8.3k citations) and Internal Medicine (501 citations). William T. Creasman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Brian N. Bundy, John A. Blessing, C. Paul Morrow, Philip J. DiSaia, Paul B. Heller, James E. Graham, Howard D. Homesley, Daniel L. Clarke‐Pearson, Francis J. Major and Franco Odicino. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Journal of Clinical Oncology and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.