John L. Lewis
- Reproductive Medicine top 0.2%
- Surgery top 1%
- Oncology top 2%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Stephen C. RubinWilliam J. HoskinsThomas B. HakesLois AlmadronesWalter B. JonesBonnie ReichmanMaurie MarkmanStephen R.J. Sheppard
- Topics
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (42 papers)Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Studies (27 papers)Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (19 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
John L. Lewis
171 papers receiving 5.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 194
- Reproductive Medicine 2.3k
- Surgery 1.9k
- Oncology 1.6k
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 1.2k
- Molecular Biology 900
Countries citing papers authored by John L. Lewis
This map shows the geographic impact of John L. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John L. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John L. Lewis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John L. Lewis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John L. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John L. Lewis. The network helps show where John L. Lewis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John L. Lewis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John L. Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John L. Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John L. Lewis. John L. Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 64 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 88 | |
| 5 | 22 | |
| 6 | 42 | |
| 7 | 29 | |
| 8 | 45 | |
| 9 | 36 | |
| 10 | 63 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 108 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | Second-line platinum therapy in patients with ovarian cancer previously treated with cisplatin.breakdown → | 647 |
| 16 | 143 | |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | Physics 11-13 | 2 |
About John L. Lewis
John L. Lewis is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Oncology, having authored 181 papers that have together received 6.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (42 papers), Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Studies (27 papers) and Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (2.3k citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (1.2k citations) and Oncology (1.6k citations). John L. Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Stephen C. Rubin, William J. Hoskins, Thomas B. Hakes, Lois Almadrones, Walter B. Jones, Bonnie Reichman, Maurie Markman, Stephen R.J. Sheppard, Wanda K. Jones and Patricia E. Saigo. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, New England Journal of Medicine and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.