László Czakó
- Surgery top 2%
- Oncology top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 5%
- Co-authors
- Tamás TakácsLászló TiszlaviczPéter HegyiJános LonovicsZoltán RakonczayDo Quy HaiIlona Sz. VargaB. Matkovics
- Topics
- Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (83 papers)Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (44 papers)Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (18 papers)
- Cited by
- SurgeryOncologyGastroenterology
- Journals
- The LancetSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaGastroenterology
- Partner nations
- HungaryUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
László Czakó
129 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Surgery 1.7k
- Oncology 889
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 500
- Epidemiology 467
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 231
Countries citing papers authored by László Czakó
This map shows the geographic impact of László Czakó's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by László Czakó with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites László Czakó more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by László Czakó
This network shows the impact of papers produced by László Czakó. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by László Czakó. The network helps show where László Czakó may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of László Czakó
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of László Czakó. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of László Czakó based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with László Czakó. László Czakó is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 29 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 29 | |
| 12 | 57 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 68 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 53 | |
| 17 | AUTOIMMUNE PANCREATITIS - AN UNDERDIAGNOSED DISEASE? | 1 |
| 18 | 23 | |
| 19 | [The first molecular analysis of a Hungarian HNPCC family: a novel MSH2 germline mutation]. | 5 |
| 20 | 14 |
About László Czakó
László Czakó is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, having authored 144 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (83 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (44 papers) and Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (1.7k citations), Oncology (889 citations) and Gastroenterology (167 citations). László Czakó has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Tamás Takács, László Tiszlavicz, Péter Hegyi, János Lonovics, Zoltán Rakonczay, Do Quy Hai, Ilona Sz. Varga, B. Matkovics, Péter Hegyi and Jeanin E. van Hooft. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Gastroenterology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.