Lani Watson

436 total citations
14 papers, 175 citations indexed

About

Lani Watson is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Lani Watson has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 175 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Philosophy, 7 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Lani Watson's work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (9 papers), Psychological and Educational Research Studies (5 papers) and Education and Critical Thinking Development (4 papers). Lani Watson is often cited by papers focused on Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (9 papers), Psychological and Educational Research Studies (5 papers) and Education and Critical Thinking Development (4 papers). Lani Watson collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Lani Watson's co-authors include Dennis Whitcomb and Joshua Habgood‐Coote and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Moral Education, Philosophy Compass and American Philosophical Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

Lani Watson

13 papers receiving 165 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Lani Watson United Kingdom	7	66	59	58	33	28	14	175
Andrew Huddleston United Kingdom	9	89 1.3×	38 0.6×	45 0.8×	11 0.3×	19 0.7×	27	204
Neville Clement Australia	11	41 0.6×	75 1.3×	271 4.7×	16 0.5×	15 0.5×	18	334
Milena Valenčić Zuljan Slovenia	10	14 0.2×	33 0.6×	240 4.1×	14 0.4×	19 0.7×	30	309
Susan J. Brison United States	6	27 0.4×	73 1.2×	7 0.1×	47 1.4×	13 0.5×	20	176
Mark Okrent United States	7	85 1.3×	39 0.7×	10 0.2×	9 0.3×	64 2.3×	15	172
P. Bruce Uhrmacher United States	9	10 0.2×	40 0.7×	158 2.7×	9 0.3×	24 0.9×	27	233
Aleksander Kobylarek Poland	8	10 0.2×	53 0.9×	63 1.1×	6 0.2×	29 1.0×	39	204
Vladimir Jankélévitch	8	46 0.7×	52 0.9×	13 0.2×	15 0.5×	23 0.8×	47	238
Carly Lassig Australia	7	10 0.2×	20 0.3×	131 2.3×	10 0.3×	54 1.9×	19	190
Melek Çakmak Türkiye	9	65 1.0×	30 0.5×	308 5.3×	7 0.2×	9 0.3×	34	361

Countries citing papers authored by Lani Watson

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lani Watson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lani Watson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lani Watson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lani Watson

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lani Watson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lani Watson. The network helps show where Lani Watson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lani Watson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lani Watson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lani Watson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lani Watson. Lani Watson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

14 of 14 papers shown

1.

Habgood‐Coote, Joshua, Lani Watson, & Dennis Whitcomb. (2022). Commentary on “Can a good philosophical contribution be made just by asking a question?”. Metaphilosophy. 54(1). 55–60. 2 indexed citations

2.

Watson, Lani. (2022). Cultivating Curiosity in the Information Age. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. 92. 129–148. 4 indexed citations

3.

Watson, Lani. (2022). The Role of Curiosity in Successful Collaboration. Scientia et Fides. 10(2). 31–49. 4 indexed citations

4.

Habgood‐Coote, Joshua, Lani Watson, & Dennis Whitcomb. (2022). Can a good philosophical contribution be made just by asking a question?¹. Metaphilosophy. 54(1). 54–54. 1 indexed citations

5.

Watson, Lani. (2021). What is a Question. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. 89. 273–297. 4 indexed citations

6.

Watson, Lani. (2021). The Right to Know. 15 indexed citations

7.

Watson, Lani. (2019). Educating for inquisitiveness: A case against exemplarism for intellectual character education. Journal of Moral Education. 48(3). 303–315. 32 indexed citations

8.

Watson, Lani, et al.. (2019). Review EssayExemplarist Moral Theory. Journal of Moral Philosophy. 16(6). 755–768. 5 indexed citations

9.

Watson, Lani. (2018). Educating for Curiosity. 293–310. 2 indexed citations

10.

Watson, Lani, et al.. (2018). Moral Psychology of Curiosity. Rowman & Littlefield eBooks. 20 indexed citations

11.

Watson, Lani. (2018). Systematic Epistemic Rights Violations in the Media: A Brexit Case Study. Social Epistemology. 32(2). 88–102. 18 indexed citations

12.

Watson, Lani. (2018). Educating for Good Questioning: a Tool for Intellectual Virtues Education. Acta Analytica. 33(3). 353–370. 21 indexed citations

13.

Watson, Lani. (2016). The Epistemology of Education. Philosophy Compass. 11(3). 146–159. 24 indexed citations

14.

Watson, Lani. (2015). What is inquisitiveness. American Philosophical Quarterly. 52(3). 273–288. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact