Lamont Booker
Impact in
- Pharmacology top 0.5%
- Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Toxicology top 0.5%
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Papers in
-
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis 4
-
- Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research 9
- Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment 1
- Co-authors
- Aron H. LichtmanBenjamin F. CravattJonathan Z. LongJames J. BurstonSteven G. KinseyJoel E. SchlosburgDana E. SelleyAntonia Serrano
- Journals
- Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (2 papers)Nature Neuroscience (1 paper)Drug and Alcohol Dependence (1 paper)Clinical Toxicology (1 paper)Nature Chemical Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Lamont Booker
10 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Pharmacology 1.6k
- Toxicology 231
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 746
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 136
- Cognitive Neuroscience 350
Countries citing papers authored by Lamont Booker
This map shows the geographic impact of Lamont Booker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lamont Booker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lamont Booker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lamont Booker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lamont Booker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lamont Booker. The network helps show where Lamont Booker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lamont Booker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 35 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 94 | |
| 5 | Chronic monoacylglycerol lipase blockade causes functional antagonism of the endocannabinoid system Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 505 |
| 6 | 2009 | 40 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 90 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 306 | |
| 9 | Selective blockade of 2-arachidonoylglycerol hydrolysis produces cannabinoid behavioral effects Hit paper breakdown → | 2008 | 745 |
| 10 | 2008 | 2 |
About Lamont Booker
Lamont Booker is a scholar working on Toxicology, Pharmacology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Small Animals, having authored 10 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (9 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (4 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (4 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (2 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (1 paper), Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment (1 paper), GABA and Rice Research (1 paper) and Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (1.6k citations), Toxicology (231 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (746 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (136 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (350 citations). Lamont Booker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Aron H. Lichtman, Benjamin F. Cravatt, Jonathan Z. Long, James J. Burston, Steven G. Kinsey, Joel E. Schlosburg, Dana E. Selley, Antonia Serrano, Loren H. Parsons and Francisco Javier Pavón. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Nature Neuroscience, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Clinical Toxicology and Nature Chemical Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.