Nature Chemical Biology

3.0k papers and 287.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.0k papers published in Nature Chemical Biology in the last decades have received a total of 287.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Nature Chemical Biology usually cover Molecular Biology (2.3k papers), Cell Biology (284 papers) and Organic Chemistry (264 papers) specifically the topics of RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (391 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (224 papers) and Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (209 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nature Chemical Biology are Andrew L. Hopkins, Christine C. Winterbourn, Christopher J. Chang, Brent R. Stockwell, Chuan He, Scott J. Dixon, Carolyn R. Bertozzi, Tracey A. Rouault, Jonathan Gershenzon and Bryan C. Dickinson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nature Chemical Biology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nature Chemical Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nature Chemical Biology.

Countries where authors publish in Nature Chemical Biology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nature Chemical Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nature Chemical Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nature Chemical Biology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025