Michael H. Bracey
Impact in
- Pharmacology top 0.2%
- Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Toxicology top 0.5%
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Papers in
-
- Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research 5
- Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases 1
-
- Enzyme function and inhibition 2
- Co-authors
- Benjamin F. Cravatt (7 shared papers)Aron H. Lichtman (2 shared papers)Kristin Demarest (1 shared paper)Matthew P. Patricelli (1 shared paper)Billy R. Martin (1 shared paper)Raymond C. Stevens (4 shared papers)Michael A. Hanson (1 shared paper)Kim Masuda (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- PLANT PHYSIOLOGY (2 papers)Biochemistry (2 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2 papers)FEBS Letters (1 paper)Journal of Biological Chemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesHungaryItaly
In The Last Decade
Michael H. Bracey
11 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Michael H. Bracey's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Pharmacology 1.9k
- Toxicology 280
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.0k
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 209
- Cognitive Neuroscience 368
Countries citing papers authored by Michael H. Bracey
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael H. Bracey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael H. Bracey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael H. Bracey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael H. Bracey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael H. Bracey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael H. Bracey. The network helps show where Michael H. Bracey may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael H. Bracey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Supersensitivity to anandamide and enhanced endogenous cannabinoid signaling in mice lacking fatty acid amide hydrolase Hit paper breakdown → | 2001 | 1080 |
| 2 | 2004 | 439 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 407 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 188 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 140 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 74 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 43 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 42 | |
| 9 | 1994 | 31 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 11 | 1995 | 6 |
About Michael H. Bracey
Michael H. Bracey is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Molecular Biology, Surgery, Cognitive Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 11 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (5 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (3 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (3 papers), Enzyme function and inhibition (2 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (1 paper), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (1 paper), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (1 paper) and Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (1.9k citations), Toxicology (280 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.0k citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (209 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (368 citations). Michael H. Bracey has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hungary and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Benjamin F. Cravatt, Aron H. Lichtman, Kristin Demarest, Matthew P. Patricelli, Billy R. Martin, Raymond C. Stevens, Michael A. Hanson, Kim Masuda, B.F. Cravatt and Daniele Piomelli. Their work appears in journals such as PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, Biochemistry, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, FEBS Letters and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.