Laila Burla is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty.
According to data from OpenAlex, Laila Burla has authored 2 papers receiving a total of 500 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in General Health Professions, 1 paper in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation and 1 paper in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. Recurrent topics in Laila Burla's work include Reliability and Agreement in Measurement (1 paper), Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (1 paper) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (1 paper). Laila Burla is often cited by papers focused on Reliability and Agreement in Measurement (1 paper), Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (1 paper) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (1 paper). Laila Burla collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland. Laila Burla's co-authors include Jürgen Barth, Margreet Duetz, Thomas Abel and Peter Rüesch and has published in prestigious journals such as Nursing Research and Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften digital collection (Zurich University of Applied Sciences).
In The Last Decade
Laila Burla
2 papers
receiving
475 citations
Hit Papers
What are hit papers?
Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
From Text to Codings
2008499 citationsLaila Burla, Jürgen Barth et al.Nursing Researchprofile →
Citations per year, relative to Laila Burla Laila Burla (= 1×)
peers
Margreet Duetz
Countries citing papers authored by Laila Burla
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Laila Burla's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laila Burla with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laila Burla more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laila Burla. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laila Burla. The network helps show where Laila Burla may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laila Burla
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laila Burla.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laila Burla based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Laila Burla. Laila Burla is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
2 of 2 papers shown
1.
Rüesch, Peter, et al.. (2009). Qualitätsindikatoren der ambulanten Pflege (Spitex) in der Schweiz auf der Grundlage von RAI-HC. Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften digital collection (Zurich University of Applied Sciences).1 indexed citations
2.
Burla, Laila, et al.. (2008). From Text to Codings. Nursing Research. 57(2). 113–117.499 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.