Laia Matas

513 citations
19 papers · 185 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Laia Matas

16 papers receiving 180 citations

Peers

Laia Matas
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 61
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 19
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 47
  • Family Practice 15
  • Toxicology 16
Replace Leire Leache with:
Leire Leache Spain
Wendy Bullington United States
Ghazwa B. Korayem Saudi Arabia
Andrés Gaviria‐Mendoza Colombia
Adnan Khalid Pakistan
Mahuya Bhattacharyya India
Luis Fernando Valladales‐Restrepo Colombia
Jolanta Gulbinovič Lithuania
André Bonnici Canada
Anniek Brink Netherlands
Laia Matas relative to Leire Leache Spain Leire Leache's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Leire Leache · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Laia Matas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laia Matas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laia Matas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laia Matas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laia Matas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laia Matas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laia Matas. The network helps show where Laia Matas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Laia Matas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Laia Matas Line = papers co-authored together Laia Matas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 202178
2 199444
3 202014
4 20029
5 20227
6 19966
7 20185
8
[Bacteremia in 13 general hospitals of the province of Barcelona. Prospective study of 1,674 episodes. Group of Microbiologists of the County Hospitals of Catalonia].
19954
9 20173
10 20213
11 20183
12 20142
13
[Fusarium solani infection in a hematology unit. Study of 2 cases and 2 isolations].
19982
14 20182
15 20162
16 20151
17
[Nocardiosis in immunosuppressed patients].
19850
18 20110
19 20160

About Laia Matas

Laia Matas is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Molecular Biology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 185 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (3 papers), Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (3 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (3 papers), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (2 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (2 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (2 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (2 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (61 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (19 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (47 citations), Family Practice (15 citations) and Toxicology (16 citations). Laia Matas has collaborated with scholars based in Spain. Frequent co-authors include Beatriz Lucas, Ana Rodrigo‐Troyano, Noé Garín, Jordi Vallés, Jordi Rello, Antonio Artigas, F. Baigorri, L. Blanch, Rafael Fernández and Eva Balada. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, Scientific Reports, Journal of Hypertension, Medicine and Frontiers in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact