L. Jane Goldsmith
- Surgery top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Oral Surgery top 2%
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Steve M. AudenJesse H. WrightStephen A. McClaveLisa M. GreeneL MakkWilliam G. CheadleHarvy L. SniderLawrence Gettleman
- Topics
- Dental Radiography and Imaging (7 papers)Asthma and respiratory diseases (5 papers)Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (4 papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of PsychiatryClinical Infectious DiseasesJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
L. Jane Goldsmith
71 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
- Surgery 822
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 368
- Epidemiology 289
- Oral Surgery 278
- Applied Psychology 204
Countries citing papers authored by L. Jane Goldsmith
This map shows the geographic impact of L. Jane Goldsmith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. Jane Goldsmith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. Jane Goldsmith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by L. Jane Goldsmith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. Jane Goldsmith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. Jane Goldsmith. The network helps show where L. Jane Goldsmith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of L. Jane Goldsmith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of L. Jane Goldsmith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of L. Jane Goldsmith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with L. Jane Goldsmith. L. Jane Goldsmith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 57 | |
| 2 | 215 | |
| 3 | 110 | |
| 4 | 75 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 93 | |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 73 | |
| 10 | 28 | |
| 11 | 49 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 51 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 63 | |
| 20 | 23 |
About L. Jane Goldsmith
L. Jane Goldsmith is a scholar working on Oral Surgery, Orthodontics and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 72 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dental Radiography and Imaging (7 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (5 papers) and Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (204 citations), Oral Surgery (278 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (196 citations). L. Jane Goldsmith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Steve M. Auden, Jesse H. Wright, Stephen A. McClave, Lisa M. Greene, L Makk, William G. Cheadle, Harvy L. Snider, Lawrence Gettleman, Monica Ramirez Basco and Anne Marie Albano. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Clinical Infectious Diseases and Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.