Andrew S. Wright

3.6k total citations
79 papers, 2.7k citations indexed

About

Andrew S. Wright is a scholar working on Surgery, Gastroenterology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew S. Wright has authored 79 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 53 papers in Surgery, 14 papers in Gastroenterology and 13 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Andrew S. Wright's work include Surgical Simulation and Training (17 papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (13 papers) and Esophageal and GI Pathology (13 papers). Andrew S. Wright is often cited by papers focused on Surgical Simulation and Training (17 papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (13 papers) and Esophageal and GI Pathology (13 papers). Andrew S. Wright collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Andrew S. Wright's co-authors include David M. Mahvi, Fred T. Lee, Lisa A. Sampson, Thomas F. Warner, Brant K. Oelschlager, Dieter Haemmerich, Karen D. Horvath, Carlos A. Pellegrini, John G. Webster and Sara Kim and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Journal of Psychiatry and Radiology.

In The Last Decade

Andrew S. Wright

75 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew S. Wright United States 22 1.0k 776 509 451 304 79 2.7k
Felix Nickel Germany 37 2.5k 2.4× 991 1.3× 150 0.3× 689 1.5× 258 0.8× 211 3.7k
G. Scott Gazelle United States 24 1.1k 1.0× 815 1.1× 1.6k 3.1× 901 2.0× 619 2.0× 54 4.2k
Erik Fosse Norway 39 2.8k 2.7× 1.5k 2.0× 364 0.7× 875 1.9× 398 1.3× 219 5.0k
Florian Vogt Germany 35 489 0.5× 1.2k 1.5× 148 0.3× 581 1.3× 1.4k 4.6× 205 4.2k
Michael M. Awad United States 25 1.3k 1.2× 379 0.5× 100 0.2× 155 0.3× 145 0.5× 94 2.6k
Christopher M. Straus United States 25 416 0.4× 249 0.3× 84 0.2× 544 1.2× 687 2.3× 91 1.7k
Frédèric Deschamps France 41 1.9k 1.8× 455 0.6× 1.5k 2.9× 1.6k 3.6× 585 1.9× 238 5.6k
Christopher M. Schlachta Canada 38 2.8k 2.7× 518 0.7× 91 0.2× 905 2.0× 91 0.3× 151 3.9k
Paul Ziprin United Kingdom 36 2.0k 1.9× 369 0.5× 66 0.1× 537 1.2× 152 0.5× 116 3.9k
Seung Hoon Kim South Korea 30 801 0.8× 201 0.3× 1.3k 2.6× 433 1.0× 756 2.5× 117 2.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew S. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew S. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew S. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew S. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew S. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew S. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew S. Wright. The network helps show where Andrew S. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew S. Wright

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew S. Wright. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew S. Wright based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew S. Wright. Andrew S. Wright is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
3.
Wright, Andrew S., et al.. (2024). The association between gender and industry payments to minimally invasive surgeons. Surgical Endoscopy. 39(1). 465–471. 1 indexed citations
4.
Meiklejohn, Duncan A., et al.. (2023). The environmental impact of surgical telemedicine: life cycle assessment of virtual vs. in-person preoperative evaluations for benign foregut disease. Surgical Endoscopy. 37(7). 5696–5702. 16 indexed citations
5.
Gravenor, Donald, A.E. Bell, James R. Cantrell, et al.. (2021). Clinical, operative, and pathologic outcomes following neoadjuvant therapy versus upfront surgery for ampullary, duodenal and distal bile duct adenocarcinoma. HPB. 23. S562–S563. 1 indexed citations
6.
Inaba, Colette S. & Andrew S. Wright. (2020). Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy and Toupet Fundoplication for Achalasia. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. 30(6). 630–634. 7 indexed citations
7.
Ehlers, Anne P., et al.. (2019). Disclosure at #SAGES2018: An analysis of physician–industry relationships of invited speakers at the 2018 SAGES national meeting. Surgical Endoscopy. 34(6). 2644–2650. 11 indexed citations
8.
Simianu, Vlad V., Jonathan G. Sham, Andrew S. Wright, et al.. (2015). A Large Animal Survival Model to Evaluate Bariatric Surgery Mechanisms. Surgical Science. 6(8). 337–345. 3 indexed citations
9.
Gandhi, Sanjay, et al.. (2015). Approach to Management of Intravascular Missile Emboli: Review of the Literature and Case Report. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 16(4). 489–496. 13 indexed citations
10.
Wright, Andrew S., et al.. (2012). Educational feedback in the operating room: a gap between resident and faculty perceptions. The American Journal of Surgery. 204(2). 248–255. 113 indexed citations
11.
Wright, Andrew S., et al.. (2011). An Instrumented Minimally Invasive Surgical Tool: Design and Calibration. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3 indexed citations
12.
Khandelwal, Saurabh, et al.. (2011). Single-Incision Laparoscopy: Training, Techniques, and Safe Introduction to Clinical Practice. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. 21(8). 687–693. 13 indexed citations
13.
Lee, Sang Soo, Brant K. Oelschlager, Andrew S. Wright, et al.. (2011). Assessment of a simple, novel endoluminal method for gastrotomy closure in NOTES. Surgical Endoscopy. 25(10). 3448–3452. 4 indexed citations
14.
Kim, Sara, Brian K. Ross, Andrew S. Wright, et al.. (2011). Halting the Revolving Door of Faculty Turnover. Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare. 6(3). 168–175. 11 indexed citations
15.
Wright, Andrew S., et al.. (2010). Aspergillus Infection of Abdominal Wall Biologic Mesh. Surgical Infections. 11(4). 405–406. 12 indexed citations
16.
Flum, David R., et al.. (2007). Development of a Porcine Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Survival Model for the Study of Post-Surgical Physiology. Obesity Surgery. 17(10). 1332–1339. 15 indexed citations
17.
Wright, Jesse H., Andrew S. Wright, Anne Marie Albano, et al.. (2005). Computer-Assisted Cognitive Therapy for Depression: Maintaining Efficacy While Reducing Therapist Time. American Journal of Psychiatry. 162(6). 1158–1164. 215 indexed citations
18.
Wright, Andrew S., Lisa A. Sampson, Thomas F. Warner, David M. Mahvi, & Fred T. Lee. (2005). Radiofrequency versus Microwave Ablation in a Hepatic Porcine Model. Radiology. 236(1). 132–139. 384 indexed citations
19.
Wright, Andrew S., Fred T. Lee, & David M. Mahvi. (2003). Hepatic Microwave Ablation With Multiple Antennae Results in Synergistically Larger Zones of Coagulation Necrosis. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 10(3). 275–283. 252 indexed citations
20.
Varghese, Tomy, James A. Zagzebski, Quan Chen, et al.. (2002). Ultrasound monitoring of temperature change during radiofrequency ablation: preliminary in-vivo results. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 28(3). 321–329. 115 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026